# SOC 29-1124: Radiation Therapists

> Occupation profile: https://www.xh1b.org/soc/29-1124

Employers submitted 43 certified H-1B applications for Radiation Therapists (29-1124) roles, requesting 47 workers. The average offered wage is $102,918/yr, close to the BLS national median ($105,310/yr). (2025, SOC 29-1124) The largest filers are Team Net Medical, IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc. and University of Vermont Medical Center.

| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total filings | 43 |
| Total workers | 47 |
| Average offered wage | $103K |
| Average prevailing wage | $81K |
| BLS median wage | $105K |
| Latest BLS year in scope | 2025 |
| Profile benchmark SOC | 29-1124 |
| BLS area | U.S. |

Filing wage badges use the latest national BLS median. Their detail shows the benchmark code and year. A mapped comparator can use a different occupation from the direct-code profile benchmark above. It is a screening comparison, not a claim that the occupations are identical.

| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Offered vs BLS benchmark | -2% |

## Top employers (of 37)

| Employer | Filings | Workers | Avg wage | BLS median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Team Net Medical](https://www.xh1b.org/org/team-net-medical-b0bc28e6c7) | 7 | 9 | $117K | $105K |
| [IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/impac-medical-systems-inc-ebee88c806) | 4 | 4 | $97K | $105K |
| [University of Vermont Medical Center](https://www.xh1b.org/org/university-of-vermont-medical-center-ade437c816) | 3 | 3 | $84K | $105K |
| [UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside](https://www.xh1b.org/org/upmc-presbyterian-shadyside-18ab4986c6) | 3 | 3 | $81K | $105K |
| [Mount Sinai Medical Center](https://www.xh1b.org/org/mount-sinai-medical-center-7028b8d533) | 3 | 3 | $89K | $105K |
| [Reading Hospital](https://www.xh1b.org/org/reading-hospital-b79084ff73) | 3 | 3 | $105K | $105K |
| [methodist lebonheur healthcare](https://www.xh1b.org/org/methodist-lebonheur-healthcare-32ec30ec8a) | 2 | 2 | $127K | $105K |
| [Oncology Services Medical Group, Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/oncology-services-medical-group-inc-3fd87cb440) | 2 | 2 | $143K | $105K |
| [Vantage Oncology, Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/vantage-oncology-inc-e7a499d314) | 2 | 2 | $100K | $105K |
| [Elekta Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/elekta-inc-b88fa29f7d) | 2 | 2 | $125K | $105K |

## Filing trend

| Year | Filings | Workers | Median offered |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 3 | 3 | $75K |
| 2011 | 6 | 6 | $82K |
| 2012 | 1 | 1 | $54K |
| 2013 | 3 | 3 | $85K |
| 2014 | 3 | 3 | $68K |
| 2015 | 3 | 3 | $142K |
| 2016 | 1 | 1 | $101K |
| 2017 | 1 | 1 | $85K |
| 2021 | 2 | 2 | $118K |
| 2022 | 3 | 3 | $128K |
| 2024 | 2 | 2 | $126K |
| 2025 | 1 | 1 | $191K |
| 2026 | 5 | 7 | $100K |

## State filing trends (2015 to 2026)

| State | Total filings | 2026 filings | 2026 filings per 100k residents |
|---|---|---|---|
| [California](https://www.xh1b.org/state/ca) | 9 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Massachusetts](https://www.xh1b.org/state/ma) | 6 | 4 | 0.1 |
| [Pennsylvania](https://www.xh1b.org/state/pa) | 5 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Illinois](https://www.xh1b.org/state/il) | 4 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Vermont](https://www.xh1b.org/state/vt) | 3 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Missouri](https://www.xh1b.org/state/mo) | 2 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Virginia](https://www.xh1b.org/state/va) | 2 | 1 | 0.0 |
| [Arizona](https://www.xh1b.org/state/az) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Florida](https://www.xh1b.org/state/fl) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Iowa](https://www.xh1b.org/state/ia) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Ohio](https://www.xh1b.org/state/oh) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Oregon](https://www.xh1b.org/state/or) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Texas](https://www.xh1b.org/state/tx) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Washington](https://www.xh1b.org/state/wa) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |


Per 100k residents uses the U.S. Census Bureau annual population estimate for that state and year; years after the latest published estimate carry that estimate forward. The latest filing year may be a partial period.

## More

- Full page (charts, tables, interactive): https://www.xh1b.org/soc/29-1124
- JSON API: https://www.xh1b.org/api/soc-employers?code=29-1124
- JSON API: https://www.xh1b.org/api/soc-filings?code=29-1124


## References

<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-lca-data"></a>

1. Dataset documentation · DOL OFLC. [LCA public disclosure record layout (FY2026 Q3)](https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/oflc/pdfs/FY26Q3/LCA_Record_Layout_FY2026_Q3.pdf). Pages 1–4: application, DOL outcome and dates, requested positions, employer, representatives, worksites and pay units. This layout covers determinations issued October 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026. It documents employer-provided application fields and DOL decisions, not USCIS decisions, payroll verification, legal bills or worker-linked moves. Older layouts can differ. Checked 2026-10-17.

<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-bls-data"></a>

2. Dataset documentation · BLS. [OEWS technical notes (May 2025)](https://www.bls.gov/oes/2025/may/oes_tec.htm). Scope of the survey; occupational coding; concepts and estimation methodology. Documents occupation and geographic wage estimates, not an individual worker’s pay. Use the estimate year and geography stated by the site; older releases can differ. Checked 2026-10-17.

<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-soc-system"></a>

3. Guidance · BLS. [Standard Occupational Classification](https://www.bls.gov/soc/finding_soc_code.htm). Classification Principles 1–2 and Coding Guideline 2; job duties, not job titles. Checked 2026-10-08.

<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-calculation-method"></a>
<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-indicators-method"></a>

4. XH1B method or registry · XH1B. [Calculation and Matching Methods; Reading Public Records and Derived Indicators](https://www.xh1b.org/data-sources). Filing units, annualization, weighting, wage comparisons, and inference limits; Reading records: units, source coverage, wage gaps, entity links, and inference limits. These are the site's review methods, not validated predictions of wrongdoing. Inspect underlying records and alternative explanations.