# SOC 29-2071: Medical Records and Health Information Technicians

> Occupation profile: https://www.xh1b.org/soc/29-2071

Employers logged 142 certified H-1B applications for Medical Records and Health Information Technicians (29-2071) roles, requesting 143 workers. The average offered wage is $50,766/yr, 26% above the BLS national median ($40,350/yr). (2018, SOC 29-2071) The largest filers are Global PHARMATEK, LLC, Integrated Resources, Inc. and Universal Medical Records Information Network Corp.

| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total filings | 142 |
| Total workers | 143 |
| Average offered wage | $51K |
| Average prevailing wage | $40K |
| BLS median wage | $40K |
| Latest BLS year in scope | 2018 |
| Profile benchmark SOC | 29-2071 |
| BLS area | U.S. |

Filing wage badges use the latest national BLS median. Their detail shows the benchmark code and year. A mapped comparator can use a different occupation from the direct-code profile benchmark above. It is a screening comparison, not a claim that the occupations are identical.

| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Offered vs BLS benchmark | +26% |

## Top employers (of 68)

| Employer | Filings | Workers | Avg wage | BLS median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Global PHARMATEK, LLC](https://www.xh1b.org/org/global-pharmatek-llc-009f7715d0) | 17 | 18 | $47K | - |
| [Integrated Resources, Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/integrated-resources-inc-2254981fc8) | 14 | 14 | $81K | - |
| [Universal Medical Records Information Network Corp.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/universal-medical-records-information-ne-fdb7bb1957) | 9 | 9 | $39K | - |
| [General Hospital Corporation](https://www.xh1b.org/org/general-hospital-corporation-d553a09684) | 8 | 8 | $39K | - |
| [The Fountain Group, LLC](https://www.xh1b.org/org/the-fountain-group-llc-a4bcb92682) | 6 | 6 | $54K | - |
| [Prime Healthcare Management, Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/prime-healthcare-management-inc-20c695e702) | 6 | 6 | $50K | - |
| [Triohm HEALTHWARE, LLC](https://www.xh1b.org/org/triohm-healthware-llc-a0a4031b66) | 5 | 5 | $38K | - |
| [TRIALYNX, Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/trialynx-inc-b27bfffa74) | 5 | 5 | $42K | - |
| [Cosmos Pharma TECHNOLOGIES, LLC](https://www.xh1b.org/org/cosmos-pharma-technologies-llc-132579d41e) | 4 | 4 | $60K | - |
| [Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center](https://www.xh1b.org/org/fred-hutchinson-cancer-research-center-1c506bfed7) | 4 | 4 | $56K | - |

## Filing trend

| Year | Filings | Workers | Median offered |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 4 | 4 | $36K |
| 2011 | 23 | 23 | $37K |
| 2012 | 10 | 10 | $39K |
| 2013 | 12 | 13 | $44K |
| 2014 | 22 | 22 | $46K |
| 2015 | 7 | 7 | $59K |
| 2016 | 10 | 10 | $60K |
| 2017 | 6 | 6 | $55K |
| 2018 | 3 | 3 | $48K |
| 2019 | 6 | 6 | $41K |
| 2020 | 1 | 1 | $57K |
| 2021 | 1 | 1 | $57K |

## State filing trends (2015 to 2021)

| State | Total filings | 2021 filings | 2021 filings per 100k residents |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Massachusetts](https://www.xh1b.org/state/ma) | 11 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [New York](https://www.xh1b.org/state/ny) | 9 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [California](https://www.xh1b.org/state/ca) | 5 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [New Jersey](https://www.xh1b.org/state/nj) | 5 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Washington](https://www.xh1b.org/state/wa) | 4 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [North Carolina](https://www.xh1b.org/state/nc) | 3 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Ohio](https://www.xh1b.org/state/oh) | 3 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Texas](https://www.xh1b.org/state/tx) | 3 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Nebraska](https://www.xh1b.org/state/ne) | 2 | 1 | 0.1 |
| [Colorado](https://www.xh1b.org/state/co) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Georgia](https://www.xh1b.org/state/ga) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Virginia](https://www.xh1b.org/state/va) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |


Per 100k residents uses the U.S. Census Bureau annual population estimate for that state and year; years after the latest published estimate carry that estimate forward. The latest filing year may be a partial period.

## More

- Full page (charts, tables, interactive): https://www.xh1b.org/soc/29-2071
- JSON API: https://www.xh1b.org/api/soc-employers?code=29-2071
- JSON API: https://www.xh1b.org/api/soc-filings?code=29-2071


## References

<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-lca-data"></a>

1. Dataset documentation · DOL OFLC. [LCA public disclosure record layout (FY2026 Q3)](https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/oflc/pdfs/FY26Q3/LCA_Record_Layout_FY2026_Q3.pdf). Pages 1–4: application, DOL outcome and dates, requested positions, employer, representatives, worksites and pay units. This layout covers determinations issued October 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026. It documents employer-provided application fields and DOL decisions, not USCIS decisions, payroll verification, legal bills or worker-linked moves. Older layouts can differ. Checked 2026-10-17.

<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-bls-data"></a>

2. Dataset documentation · BLS. [OEWS technical notes (May 2025)](https://www.bls.gov/oes/2025/may/oes_tec.htm). Scope of the survey; occupational coding; concepts and estimation methodology. Documents occupation and geographic wage estimates, not an individual worker’s pay. Use the estimate year and geography stated by the site; older releases can differ. Checked 2026-10-17.

<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-soc-system"></a>

3. Guidance · BLS. [Standard Occupational Classification](https://www.bls.gov/soc/finding_soc_code.htm). Classification Principles 1–2 and Coding Guideline 2; job duties, not job titles. Checked 2026-10-08.

<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-calculation-method"></a>
<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-indicators-method"></a>

4. XH1B method or registry · XH1B. [Calculation and Matching Methods; Reading Public Records and Derived Indicators](https://www.xh1b.org/data-sources). Filing units, annualization, weighting, wage comparisons, and inference limits; Reading records: units, source coverage, wage gaps, entity links, and inference limits. These are the site's review methods, not validated predictions of wrongdoing. Inspect underlying records and alternative explanations.