# SOC 37-1012: First-Line Supervisors of Landscaping, Lawn Service, and Groundskeeping Workers

> Occupation profile: https://www.xh1b.org/soc/37-1012

Employers logged 22 certified H-1B applications for First-Line Supervisors of Landscaping, Lawn Service, and Groundskeeping Workers (37-1012) roles, requesting 26 workers. The average offered wage is $49,969/yr, 14% below the BLS national median ($58,430/yr). (2025, SOC 37-1012) The largest filers are Robert Trent Jones Golf CLUB, Inc., The LOS Angeles Country Club and Quail Hollow Country Club.

| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total filings | 22 |
| Total workers | 26 |
| Average offered wage | $50K |
| Average prevailing wage | $43K |
| BLS median wage | $58K |
| Latest BLS year in scope | 2025 |
| Profile benchmark SOC | 37-1012 |
| BLS area | U.S. |

Filing wage badges use the latest national BLS median. Their detail shows the benchmark code and year. A mapped comparator can use a different occupation from the direct-code profile benchmark above. It is a screening comparison, not a claim that the occupations are identical.

| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Offered vs BLS benchmark | -14% |

## Top employers (of 44)

| Employer | Filings | Workers | Avg wage | BLS median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Robert Trent Jones Golf CLUB, Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/robert-trent-jones-golf-club-inc-de31fcb1b2) | 9 | 9 | $40K | $58K |
| [The LOS Angeles Country Club](https://www.xh1b.org/org/the-los-angeles-country-club-d03c4f8a2e) | 6 | 6 | $58K | $58K |
| [Quail Hollow Country Club](https://www.xh1b.org/org/quail-hollow-country-club-6a92259dfe) | 4 | 4 | $40K | $58K |
| [Akehurst Landscape SERVICE, Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/akehurst-landscape-service-inc-e3db3827db) | 4 | 4 | $49K | $58K |
| [The Annenberg Foundation Trust AT Sunnylands](https://www.xh1b.org/org/the-annenberg-foundation-trust-at-sunnyl-54e54293ef) | 4 | 4 | $35K | $58K |
| [Glen Head Country CLUB, Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/glen-head-country-club-inc-be3342641a) | 4 | 4 | $68K | $58K |
| [Desert Mountain Club, Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/desert-mountain-club-inc-68f8d86ffb) | 3 | 3 | $118K | $58K |
| [Congressional Country Club, Inc](https://www.xh1b.org/org/congressional-country-club-inc-5dee2ea231) | 3 | 3 | $72K | $58K |
| [Chevy Chase Club, Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/chevy-chase-club-inc-6c153d4524) | 3 | 3 | $59K | $58K |
| [KT Enterprises Inc](https://www.xh1b.org/org/kt-enterprises-inc-f4317ff2b6) | 3 | 3 | $32K | $58K |

## Filing trend

| Year | Filings | Workers | Median offered |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 3 | 3 | $32K |
| 2011 | 7 | 7 | $40K |
| 2012 | 3 | 3 | $47K |
| 2013 | 2 | 2 | $61K |
| 2014 | 5 | 5 | $41K |
| 2015 | 3 | 3 | - |
| 2016 | 3 | 3 | $34K |

## State filing trends (2015 to 2026)

| State | Total filings | 2026 filings | 2026 filings per 100k residents |
|---|---|---|---|
| [California](https://www.xh1b.org/state/ca) | 13 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Maryland](https://www.xh1b.org/state/md) | 6 | 1 | 0.0 |
| [Arizona](https://www.xh1b.org/state/az) | 5 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [New York](https://www.xh1b.org/state/ny) | 5 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [North Carolina](https://www.xh1b.org/state/nc) | 4 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Pennsylvania](https://www.xh1b.org/state/pa) | 4 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Florida](https://www.xh1b.org/state/fl) | 3 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Nevada](https://www.xh1b.org/state/nv) | 3 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Virginia](https://www.xh1b.org/state/va) | 3 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Massachusetts](https://www.xh1b.org/state/ma) | 2 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Alabama](https://www.xh1b.org/state/al) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Arkansas](https://www.xh1b.org/state/ar) | 1 | 1 | 0.0 |
| [Michigan](https://www.xh1b.org/state/mi) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Minnesota](https://www.xh1b.org/state/mn) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [New Jersey](https://www.xh1b.org/state/nj) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |


Per 100k residents uses the U.S. Census Bureau annual population estimate for that state and year; years after the latest published estimate carry that estimate forward. The latest filing year may be a partial period.

## More

- Full page (charts, tables, interactive): https://www.xh1b.org/soc/37-1012
- JSON API: https://www.xh1b.org/api/soc-employers?code=37-1012
- JSON API: https://www.xh1b.org/api/soc-filings?code=37-1012


## References

<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-lca-data"></a>

1. Dataset documentation · DOL OFLC. [LCA public disclosure record layout (FY2026 Q3)](https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/oflc/pdfs/FY26Q3/LCA_Record_Layout_FY2026_Q3.pdf). Pages 1–4: application, DOL outcome and dates, requested positions, employer, representatives, worksites and pay units. This layout covers determinations issued October 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026. It documents employer-provided application fields and DOL decisions, not USCIS decisions, payroll verification, legal bills or worker-linked moves. Older layouts can differ. Checked 2026-10-17.

<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-bls-data"></a>

2. Dataset documentation · BLS. [OEWS technical notes (May 2025)](https://www.bls.gov/oes/2025/may/oes_tec.htm). Scope of the survey; occupational coding; concepts and estimation methodology. Documents occupation and geographic wage estimates, not an individual worker’s pay. Use the estimate year and geography stated by the site; older releases can differ. Checked 2026-10-17.

<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-soc-system"></a>

3. Guidance · BLS. [Standard Occupational Classification](https://www.bls.gov/soc/finding_soc_code.htm). Classification Principles 1–2 and Coding Guideline 2; job duties, not job titles. Checked 2026-10-08.

<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-calculation-method"></a>
<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-indicators-method"></a>

4. XH1B method or registry · XH1B. [Calculation and Matching Methods; Reading Public Records and Derived Indicators](https://www.xh1b.org/data-sources). Filing units, annualization, weighting, wage comparisons, and inference limits; Reading records: units, source coverage, wage gaps, entity links, and inference limits. These are the site's review methods, not validated predictions of wrongdoing. Inspect underlying records and alternative explanations.