# SOC 41-1012: First-Line Supervisors of Non-Retail Sales Workers

> Occupation profile: https://www.xh1b.org/soc/41-1012

Employers logged 128 certified H-1B applications for First-Line Supervisors of Non-Retail Sales Workers (41-1012) roles, requesting 128 workers. The average offered wage is $58,113/yr, 34% below the BLS national median ($87,520/yr). (2025, SOC 41-1012) The largest filers are Universal Worldwide Trading Inc., Katsu International and Denyll Inc.

| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total filings | 128 |
| Total workers | 128 |
| Average offered wage | $58K |
| Average prevailing wage | $55K |
| BLS median wage | $88K |
| Latest BLS year in scope | 2025 |
| Profile benchmark SOC | 41-1012 |
| BLS area | U.S. |

Filing wage badges use the latest national BLS median. Their detail shows the benchmark code and year. A mapped comparator can use a different occupation from the direct-code profile benchmark above. It is a screening comparison, not a claim that the occupations are identical.

| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Offered vs BLS benchmark | -34% |

## Top employers (of 110)

| Employer | Filings | Workers | Avg wage | BLS median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Universal Worldwide Trading Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/universal-worldwide-trading-inc-586956b21a) | 9 | 9 | $39K | $88K |
| [Katsu International](https://www.xh1b.org/org/katsu-international-7f44c42069) | 5 | 5 | $46K | $88K |
| [Denyll Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/denyll-inc-a405a965d4) | 4 | 4 | $65K | $88K |
| [Beauty Trends, Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/beauty-trends-inc-6931f93163) | 4 | 4 | $42K | $88K |
| [Pacific Exchange DISTRIBUTORS, LLC.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/pacific-exchange-distributors-llc-b7e2a3d7b7) | 4 | 4 | $42K | $88K |
| [Power Oil Inc](https://www.xh1b.org/org/power-oil-inc-2acaa979da) | 4 | 4 | $56K | $88K |
| [Snowmass Holdco LLC](https://www.xh1b.org/org/snowmass-holdco-llc-8f560c8dd7) | 3 | 3 | $0 | $88K |
| [Grundfos CBS, Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/grundfos-cbs-inc-a5bfe9c1b0) | 3 | 3 | $114K | $88K |
| [Genewiz Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/genewiz-inc-2086684de6) | 3 | 3 | $48K | $88K |
| [FM Corporation](https://www.xh1b.org/org/fm-corporation-ff94b93682) | 3 | 3 | $22K | $88K |

## Filing trend

| Year | Filings | Workers | Median offered |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 12 | 12 | $40K |
| 2011 | 19 | 19 | $55K |
| 2012 | 22 | 22 | $48K |
| 2013 | 18 | 18 | $62K |
| 2014 | 11 | 11 | $57K |
| 2015 | 12 | 12 | $84K |
| 2016 | 3 | 3 | $82K |
| 2017 | 2 | 2 | $53K |
| 2018 | 1 | 1 | $47K |
| 2020 | 1 | 1 | $111K |
| 2021 | 1 | 1 | $70K |
| 2022 | 6 | 6 | $56K |
| 2023 | 1 | 1 | $131K |
| 2024 | 2 | 2 | $79K |
| 2025 | 2 | 2 | $86K |
| 2026 | 1 | 1 | $99K |

## State filing trends (2015 to 2026)

| State | Total filings | 2026 filings | 2026 filings per 100k residents |
|---|---|---|---|
| [New York](https://www.xh1b.org/state/ny) | 12 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [California](https://www.xh1b.org/state/ca) | 8 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Texas](https://www.xh1b.org/state/tx) | 7 | 1 | 0.0 |
| [Colorado](https://www.xh1b.org/state/co) | 5 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Florida](https://www.xh1b.org/state/fl) | 5 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Hawaii](https://www.xh1b.org/state/hi) | 5 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [New Jersey](https://www.xh1b.org/state/nj) | 5 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Georgia](https://www.xh1b.org/state/ga) | 3 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Virginia](https://www.xh1b.org/state/va) | 3 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Puerto Rico](https://www.xh1b.org/state/pr) | 2 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Tennessee](https://www.xh1b.org/state/tn) | 2 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Arizona](https://www.xh1b.org/state/az) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [District of Columbia](https://www.xh1b.org/state/dc) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Iowa](https://www.xh1b.org/state/ia) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Missouri](https://www.xh1b.org/state/mo) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Washington](https://www.xh1b.org/state/wa) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |


Per 100k residents uses the U.S. Census Bureau annual population estimate for that state and year; years after the latest published estimate carry that estimate forward. The latest filing year may be a partial period.

## More

- Full page (charts, tables, interactive): https://www.xh1b.org/soc/41-1012
- JSON API: https://www.xh1b.org/api/soc-employers?code=41-1012
- JSON API: https://www.xh1b.org/api/soc-filings?code=41-1012


## References

<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-lca-data"></a>

1. Dataset documentation · DOL OFLC. [LCA public disclosure record layout (FY2026 Q3)](https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/oflc/pdfs/FY26Q3/LCA_Record_Layout_FY2026_Q3.pdf). Pages 1–4: application, DOL outcome and dates, requested positions, employer, representatives, worksites and pay units. This layout covers determinations issued October 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026. It documents employer-provided application fields and DOL decisions, not USCIS decisions, payroll verification, legal bills or worker-linked moves. Older layouts can differ. Checked 2026-10-17.

<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-bls-data"></a>

2. Dataset documentation · BLS. [OEWS technical notes (May 2025)](https://www.bls.gov/oes/2025/may/oes_tec.htm). Scope of the survey; occupational coding; concepts and estimation methodology. Documents occupation and geographic wage estimates, not an individual worker’s pay. Use the estimate year and geography stated by the site; older releases can differ. Checked 2026-10-17.

<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-soc-system"></a>

3. Guidance · BLS. [Standard Occupational Classification](https://www.bls.gov/soc/finding_soc_code.htm). Classification Principles 1–2 and Coding Guideline 2; job duties, not job titles. Checked 2026-10-08.

<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-calculation-method"></a>
<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-indicators-method"></a>

4. XH1B method or registry · XH1B. [Calculation and Matching Methods; Reading Public Records and Derived Indicators](https://www.xh1b.org/data-sources). Filing units, annualization, weighting, wage comparisons, and inference limits; Reading records: units, source coverage, wage gaps, entity links, and inference limits. These are the site's review methods, not validated predictions of wrongdoing. Inspect underlying records and alternative explanations.