# SOC 49-1011: First-Line Supervisors of Mechanics, Installers, and Repairers

> Occupation profile: https://www.xh1b.org/soc/49-1011

Employers logged 53 certified H-1B applications for First-Line Supervisors of Mechanics, Installers, and Repairers (49-1011) roles, requesting 53 workers. The average offered wage is $65,688/yr, 18% below the BLS national median ($79,860/yr). (2025, SOC 49-1011) The largest filers are Manhattan Swedish cars, ANLAC, LLC and Crystal Taylor SYSTEMS, Inc.

| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total filings | 53 |
| Total workers | 53 |
| Average offered wage | $66K |
| Average prevailing wage | $57K |
| BLS median wage | $80K |
| Latest BLS year in scope | 2025 |
| Profile benchmark SOC | 49-1011 |
| BLS area | U.S. |

Filing wage badges use the latest national BLS median. Their detail shows the benchmark code and year. A mapped comparator can use a different occupation from the direct-code profile benchmark above. It is a screening comparison, not a claim that the occupations are identical.

| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Offered vs BLS benchmark | -18% |

## Top employers (of 47)

| Employer | Filings | Workers | Avg wage | BLS median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Manhattan Swedish cars](https://www.xh1b.org/org/manhattan-swedish-cars-b043cabf56) | 6 | 6 | $104K | $80K |
| [ANLAC, LLC](https://www.xh1b.org/org/anlac-llc-93045d8fbc) | 6 | 6 | $47K | $80K |
| [Crystal Taylor SYSTEMS, Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/crystal-taylor-systems-inc-8e2c52c0a6) | 6 | 6 | $49K | $80K |
| [EZ Moto Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/ez-moto-inc-9ad16b780e) | 5 | 5 | $54K | $80K |
| [Lowcountry Aviation Company Asset RENTALS, LLC](https://www.xh1b.org/org/lowcountry-aviation-company-asset-rental-2b9d4fce2e) | 4 | 4 | $36K | $80K |
| [Photo Tech Repair SERVICE, Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/photo-tech-repair-service-inc-62bf8d8c3b) | 3 | 3 | $64K | $80K |
| [Premier Hydraulic SERVICES, Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/premier-hydraulic-services-inc-793ce8b626) | 3 | 3 | $44K | $80K |
| [AMS of VA, Inc.](https://www.xh1b.org/org/ams-of-va-inc-0e0353fac6) | 3 | 3 | $36K | $80K |
| [Custom Food Solutions LLC](https://www.xh1b.org/org/custom-food-solutions-llc-d8cdbd97f9) | 3 | 3 | $75K | $80K |
| [Beach Capital MANAGEMENT, LLC](https://www.xh1b.org/org/beach-capital-management-llc-6010ce8f41) | 3 | 3 | $140K | $80K |

## Filing trend

| Year | Filings | Workers | Median offered |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 1 | 1 | $52K |
| 2011 | 5 | 5 | $60K |
| 2012 | 12 | 12 | $72K |
| 2013 | 3 | 3 | $49K |
| 2014 | 2 | 2 | $60K |
| 2015 | 4 | 4 | - |
| 2016 | 2 | 2 | $53K |
| 2019 | 1 | 1 | $55K |
| 2020 | 1 | 1 | $145K |
| 2021 | 1 | 1 | $66K |
| 2022 | 4 | 4 | $33K |
| 2023 | 1 | 1 | $65K |
| 2024 | 2 | 2 | $52K |
| 2025 | 1 | 1 | $48K |

## State filing trends (2015 to 2026)

| State | Total filings | 2026 filings | 2026 filings per 100k residents |
|---|---|---|---|
| [New York](https://www.xh1b.org/state/ny) | 12 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [South Carolina](https://www.xh1b.org/state/sc) | 8 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Kentucky](https://www.xh1b.org/state/ky) | 4 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Virginia](https://www.xh1b.org/state/va) | 4 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [California](https://www.xh1b.org/state/ca) | 3 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Florida](https://www.xh1b.org/state/fl) | 2 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Alabama](https://www.xh1b.org/state/al) | 1 | 1 | 0.0 |
| [Arizona](https://www.xh1b.org/state/az) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Maryland](https://www.xh1b.org/state/md) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Mississippi](https://www.xh1b.org/state/ms) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [North Carolina](https://www.xh1b.org/state/nc) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Nevada](https://www.xh1b.org/state/nv) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Pennsylvania](https://www.xh1b.org/state/pa) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Texas](https://www.xh1b.org/state/tx) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| [Utah](https://www.xh1b.org/state/ut) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |


Per 100k residents uses the U.S. Census Bureau annual population estimate for that state and year; years after the latest published estimate carry that estimate forward. The latest filing year may be a partial period.

## More

- Full page (charts, tables, interactive): https://www.xh1b.org/soc/49-1011
- JSON API: https://www.xh1b.org/api/soc-employers?code=49-1011
- JSON API: https://www.xh1b.org/api/soc-filings?code=49-1011


## References

<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-lca-data"></a>

1. Dataset documentation · DOL OFLC. [LCA public disclosure record layout (FY2026 Q3)](https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/oflc/pdfs/FY26Q3/LCA_Record_Layout_FY2026_Q3.pdf). Pages 1–4: application, DOL outcome and dates, requested positions, employer, representatives, worksites and pay units. This layout covers determinations issued October 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026. It documents employer-provided application fields and DOL decisions, not USCIS decisions, payroll verification, legal bills or worker-linked moves. Older layouts can differ. Checked 2026-10-17.

<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-bls-data"></a>

2. Dataset documentation · BLS. [OEWS technical notes (May 2025)](https://www.bls.gov/oes/2025/may/oes_tec.htm). Scope of the survey; occupational coding; concepts and estimation methodology. Documents occupation and geographic wage estimates, not an individual worker’s pay. Use the estimate year and geography stated by the site; older releases can differ. Checked 2026-10-17.

<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-soc-system"></a>

3. Guidance · BLS. [Standard Occupational Classification](https://www.bls.gov/soc/finding_soc_code.htm). Classification Principles 1–2 and Coding Guideline 2; job duties, not job titles. Checked 2026-10-08.

<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-calculation-method"></a>
<a id="reference-data-lca-data-bls-data-soc-system-calculation-method-indicators-method-indicators-method"></a>

4. XH1B method or registry · XH1B. [Calculation and Matching Methods; Reading Public Records and Derived Indicators](https://www.xh1b.org/data-sources). Filing units, annualization, weighting, wage comparisons, and inference limits; Reading records: units, source coverage, wage gaps, entity links, and inference limits. These are the site's review methods, not validated predictions of wrongdoing. Inspect underlying records and alternative explanations.