01
Employer dossiers
Follow filings, worksites, representatives, and matched public records from one employer page.
Research workflow
From a named employer to a reviewable record
Each line of inquiry stays connected to its source, period, and scope. Open the underlying public record before relying on a comparison.
02
Dates and comparisons
Compare offered wages with the stated benchmarks and inspect the timing of matched layoff notices. Keep estimates separate from reported findings.
03
Relationship research
Trace corporate and professional connections. Check the source and dates for each link before drawing an inference.
04
Source review
Keep source identifiers, citations, exports, and documented data gaps alongside the analysis.
Investigation surface
Use Frank for the investigation
Ask a question in plain English, inspect the SQL and returned records, then follow up. Frank can read uploaded material, trace relationships, and assemble a case folder for review. The documentation shows the workflow with fictional product examples.
Case file viewer · meridian_wage-suppression_20260907
SHA256SUMS ✓Files
- meridian_wage-suppression_20260907/
- report.tex
- report.pdf
- counteranalysis.md
- evidence/
- lcas_rows.csv
- bls_medians.csv
- graph_edges.csv
- queries/
- wage_history.sql
- provenance/
- raw_files.jsonl
- SHA256SUMS
report.pdfdraft, not sealed
XH1B case file
Wage suppression across successor staffing entities
Summary. Offered wages at Meridian Clinical Staffing LLC run 27% below the occupation median by 2025. The inflection follows a 2022 reorganization that produced two successors under a shared registered agent; both successors repeat the pattern.
Case against. Wage floors track a county-level market shift; the successors price to a renegotiated client contract. Tested against BLS medians for the same area; the gap persists.
Cited records: lcas ×212 · bls_wages ×7 · graph_edges ×3
SHA256SUMS
9f2c81aa7b…e34b71cd report.pdf d4a07e1155…90bc22fa evidence/lcas_rows.csv 4471ccb80e…5a9d10e2 provenance/raw_files.jsonl
Draft case folder as the viewer renders it. Contents are demonstrative.
Working together
Start with a scope conversation
Tell us the employers, time period, research questions, and output you need. We will discuss coverage, deliverables, security requirements, and fees before work starts.
Focused research
A defined question about one employer or a small group, with agreed source coverage and outputs.
Broader investigations
Discuss a larger employer set, repeat analysis, or a private Frank deployment with the integrations your team needs.
Reading the record
Review before relying on a result
A match is a lead. It is not a verdict.
A hash can help detect a changed file. It does not establish that the source statement is true or that a document is admissible. A matched layoff and filing are a research lead, not proof that one worker replaced another. Review entity matches, source dates, missing coverage, and alternative explanations.
Questions about the data & methods
Attorney research questions
What can this archive do for case research?
It connects employer filings, offered wages, layoff notices, and other matched public records. Use the dossiers to identify relevant source records and questions that need further evidence.
What does a file hash establish?
A matching hash helps verify that a file has not changed since that hash was recorded. It does not prove the source statement is true or establish admissibility.
What does a Frank case folder contain?
The case-file workflow brings together a report, cited records, saved queries, and checksums for review. The Frank documentation shows the format with fictional examples.
How are research fees set?
Contact us to discuss the employers, period, sources, outputs, and security requirements. Scope and fees are agreed before work starts. This page does not publish fixed packages or referral percentages.
Does a WARN and H-1B match prove replacement?
No. It identifies records near each other in time and linked to an employer. Check the worksite, occupation, dates, and other evidence before drawing a conclusion about individual workers.