County intelligence

Salt Lake County

Utah (UT) · FIPS 49035 · 3,801 employers · 27,552 filings with wage data

Employers in Salt Lake, UT filed 29,389 certified H-1B applications requesting 73,834 workers across 3,542 companies. The median offered wage is $80,174/yr. The largest filers are Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Goldman Sachs Services LLC and Goldman Sachs Bank USA. The displacement model assigns 93.6K worker-equivalent exposures to these filings.

Data current as of Sep 2, 2026

Filings & wages

Annual filing records and a county-level wage comparison.

Filing history

Annual DOL filing records. Workers requested are not confirmed hires.

02K4K6K8K10K12K14Kpeak 3K (2019)2007: 121 filings (317 workers)2008: 857 filings (1,756 workers)2009: 523 filings (796 workers)2010: 189 filings (403 workers)2011: 1,089 filings (2,865 workers)2012: 1,143 filings (3,334 workers)2013: 1,209 filings (2,339 workers)2014: 367 filings (1,012 workers)2015: 1,926 filings (4,666 workers)2016: 2,046 filings (4,606 workers)2017: 2,022 filings (3,013 workers)2018: 2,270 filings (3,465 workers)2019: 2,832 filings (3,272 workers)2020: 1,993 filings (2,840 workers)2021: 2,365 filings (3,450 workers)2022: 2,382 filings (3,040 workers)2023: 2,291 filings (6,326 workers)2024: 1,980 filings (2,266 workers)2025: 2,288 filings (11,556 workers)2026: 668 filings (15,011 workers)200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262007: 317 workers2008: 1,756 workers2009: 796 workers2010: 403 workers2011: 2,865 workers2012: 3,334 workers2013: 2,339 workers2014: 1,012 workers2015: 4,666 workers2016: 4,606 workers2017: 3,013 workers2018: 3,465 workers2019: 3,272 workers2020: 2,840 workers2021: 3,450 workers2022: 3,040 workers2023: 6,326 workers2024: 2,266 workers2025: 11,556 workers2026: 15,011 workersfilings
filingsworkers (scaled)
Inspect filing outcomes All available years and DOL statuses

Certified, denied, and withdrawn counts describe application decisions. They do not measure visas issued or workers hired.

Offered-wage distribution

Percentiles across 27,128 positive year-unit LCA offers, all outcomes and visa classes.

$46,702$70,445$94,189$117,933$141,676$80,800annual wage

Application outcomes all available years

  • Certified28,853 · 96.1%
  • Denied461 · 1.5%
  • Withdrawn711 · 2.4%
How this distribution is built Year-unit offers, all outcomes and visa classes

The distribution covers positive offers with wage unit Year, across all outcomes and visa classes. It differs from the certified H-1B summary cohort. It does not adjust for occupation, employer, or worksite mix.

Downstream impact

Conditional effects of this county's modeled displacement exposure.

Americans displaced (modeled estimate)

93,600

The math
Base (1 per certified worker)
+73,834
Wage-gap multiplier

21152 of 29389 filings below BLS median

+19,766
Total93,600

Σ workers×(1+wage_gap) + Σ WARN layoffs. The 1.0 base rate per certified H-1B worker request is a site model assumption. Wage gap multiplier = (BLS median − offered wage) / BLS median, applied only to filings offering less than the BLS median. Related research provides context, not validation of these exact coefficients. This is a modeled estimate, not a count of actual displacements.

Exposure method v1.2 · This is a modeled worker-equivalent count.

Modeled consequence estimates

Conditional impacts associated with modeled displacement

Explore Salt Lake County’s scenarioEarnings · children · health · adjust the worker count

These are conditional population estimates scaled from Salt Lake County's current modeled displacement count. They are not observed outcomes, a prediction about any person, or evidence that this entity caused displacement.

Exposure method v1.2 (stored with this aggregate) · benchmarked to the latest BLS survey. Consequence parameters v1.52; build v1.52+engine0.4.0+99173fbf23e75037da3fb9b4a9017a1e56909260ccb112f9902bc5ac86242153+national-reference1

Excess deaths over 20 years

Illustrative reference calculation · population applicability is not established

2,691.82

Range: 1,054.15 to 4,688.95

20-year reference scenario: high-seniority male displacement effect. This is not an expected count for an unknown population.

Source-profile mortality point (deaths)
2,691.81619127
No sustained excess from year 7 (deaths)
1,920.98511579

Declared structural comparison; not a confidence interval or a model probability.

Baseline population: US prime-age men (45-54).

Child lifetime earnings lost

Illustrative reference calculation · population applicability is not established

$44.8B

Range: $11.6B to $75.7B

Canadian father–son firm-closure effect, applied to a US male lifetime-earnings baseline in 2024 dollars. The reference result uses 2 children per worker.

Baseline population: US male median lifetime earnings.

The mortality effect comes from a high-seniority male study cohort. Treat the count as a reference scenario unless the population matches. A mixed population needs a reviewed transport rule.

The range is the engine's parameter-support envelope: it varies declared parameters only and adds none of the exposure input's uncertainty.

The math, limits, and citations

Illustrative reference calculation scaled by the supplied worker-equivalent exposure. Two children per worker; 20-year mortality follow-up. This does not establish that an entity caused these outcomes.

Input SHA-256: 65625244b6014b6429cf6d6fd7f3f525fdafb6dce287e996ad1a82b5db273d17

Excess deaths over 20 years: {"status":"illustrative_reference_calculation","eligible_for_public_headline":false,"target_population":null,"decision":null,"transport_assumptions":["high-tenure male mass-layoff cohort, ages 45–54","Pennsylvania early-1980s response transported to target place and calendar time","fixed baseline age rate over follow-up; cohort aging is not modeled"],"reason":"Target cohort applicability and transport have not been established for this outcome; display as an illustrative reference calculation."}

Child lifetime earnings lost: {"status":"illustrative_reference_calculation","eligible_for_public_headline":false,"target_population":null,"decision":null,"transport_assumptions":["Canadian father-son firm-closure estimate transported to the target families","US male synthetic career earnings convert a relative adult earnings effect to dollars","lifetime dollars are undiscounted; this is not an annual loss"],"reason":"Target cohort applicability and transport have not been established for this outcome; display as an illustrative reference calculation."}

Projection eligibility: {"child":{"status":"direct_estimate","eligible_for_validated_direct_contrast":true,"reason":"direct displacement-to-child adult earnings estimate; transport still requires an applicability decision"},"grandchild":{"status":"structural_projection","eligible_for_validated_direct_contrast":false,"reason":"combines a direct child estimate with an intergenerational persistence assumption; not an identified displacement intervention effect"},"greatgrandchild":{"status":"structural_projection","eligible_for_validated_direct_contrast":false,"reason":"repeats an intergenerational persistence assumption beyond the identification core"}}

Exposure source: {"source":"one-worker normalized reference input","method":"scale by the stored warehouse worker-equivalent exposure at read time"}

Exact values: excess deaths over 20 years 2,691.81619127 (range 1,054.14961201 to 4,688.9471726); child lifetime earnings lost $44,824,468,855.11 (range $11,642,719,183.15 to $75,677,674,690.45);

The displayed range is a parameter-support envelope, not a confidence interval.

Place reference: national reference.

Not included: exposure estimation error; baseline estimation error; unmodeled pathways.

Blocked model paths: local_service_jobs_lost: requires a documented net local loss of tradable jobs; worker displacement alone is not this exposure.

  • Excess deaths over 20 years: sullivan2009 (earnings_shock->mortality_peak; canonical) Study population: US high-seniority displaced men born 1930-1959.
  • Excess deaths over 20 years: sullivan2009 (earnings_shock->mortality_offset_1; canonical) Study population: US high-seniority displaced men born 1930-1959.
  • Excess deaths over 20 years: sullivan2009 (earnings_shock->mortality_offsets_2_3; canonical) Study population: US high-seniority displaced men born 1930-1959.
  • Excess deaths over 20 years: sullivan2009 (earnings_shock->mortality_offsets_4_5; canonical) Study population: US high-seniority displaced men born 1930-1959.
  • Excess deaths over 20 years: sullivan2009 (earnings_shock->mortality_sustained; canonical) Study population: US high-seniority displaced men born 1930-1959.
  • Child lifetime earnings lost: oreopoulos2008 (displacement->child_earnings; EXACT) Study population: Canada 39k father-son pairs firm closures.
Scenario assumptions, sensitivity and source records

Outcome statistics use the displayed exposure. Baselines, coefficients, annual family schedules and component records retain their source normalization.

{
  "displayed_workers": 93599.971,
  "source_normalization_workers": 1,
  "applicability": {
    "excess_deaths": {
      "status": "illustrative_reference_calculation",
      "eligible_for_public_headline": false,
      "target_population": null,
      "decision": null,
      "transport_assumptions": [
        "high-tenure male mass-layoff cohort, ages 45–54",
        "Pennsylvania early-1980s response transported to target place and calendar time",
        "fixed baseline age rate over follow-up; cohort aging is not modeled"
      ],
      "reason": "Target cohort applicability and transport have not been established for this outcome; display as an illustrative reference calculation."
    },
    "child_lifetime_earnings_lost_usd": {
      "status": "illustrative_reference_calculation",
      "eligible_for_public_headline": false,
      "target_population": null,
      "decision": null,
      "transport_assumptions": [
        "Canadian father-son firm-closure estimate transported to the target families",
        "US male synthetic career earnings convert a relative adult earnings effect to dollars",
        "lifetime dollars are undiscounted; this is not an annual loss"
      ],
      "reason": "Target cohort applicability and transport have not been established for this outcome; display as an illustrative reference calculation."
    }
  },
  "target_population": null,
  "projection_eligibility": {
    "child": {
      "status": "direct_estimate",
      "eligible_for_validated_direct_contrast": true,
      "reason": "direct displacement-to-child adult earnings estimate; transport still requires an applicability decision"
    },
    "grandchild": {
      "status": "structural_projection",
      "eligible_for_validated_direct_contrast": false,
      "reason": "combines a direct child estimate with an intergenerational persistence assumption; not an identified displacement intervention effect"
    },
    "greatgrandchild": {
      "status": "structural_projection",
      "eligible_for_validated_direct_contrast": false,
      "reason": "repeats an intergenerational persistence assumption beyond the identification core"
    }
  },
  "child_applicability": {
    "source": "oreopoulos2008",
    "source_age_at_displacement": [
      10,
      14
    ],
    "source_child_sex": "Male",
    "source_parent_sex": "Male",
    "source_geography": "Canada",
    "source_event": "father firm closure 1980-1982",
    "target_child_profiles": null,
    "incompatible_children": [],
    "unknown_children": [],
    "source_income_quartile": null,
    "income_rank_definition": null,
    "eligible_for_reviewed_transport": false,
    "status": "unknown",
    "limitations": [
      "No response curve across child ages is identified by this narrow cohort.",
      "Income groups refer to father's average pre-displacement income in 1978-1979; target rank mapping requires a transport argument.",
      "A subgroup's nonsignificant coefficient is retained with its uncertainty, not replaced with zero."
    ]
  },
  "child_valuation": null,
  "assumptions": {
    "mortality_method": "odds_survival",
    "mortality_timing": "Source-offset profile: displacement, +1, +2–3, +4–5, and +6+; displacement is follow-up year 1, so offset +6 begins in follow-up year 7. Annual baseline rates use a constant-hazard rate-to-risk conversion; odds ratios modify annual risk, and survival compounds across phases. The selected baseline age rate is held fixed over the follow-up horizon.",
    "mortality_contract": {
      "method": "odds_survival",
      "timing": "source_profile",
      "baseline_conversion": "1-exp(-annual_rate)",
      "phases": [
        {
          "phase": "displacement",
          "start_offset": 0,
          "duration_years": 1,
          "first_follow_up_year": 1
        },
        {
          "phase": "offset_1",
          "start_offset": 1,
          "duration_years": 1,
          "first_follow_up_year": 2
        },
        {
          "phase": "offsets_2_3",
          "start_offset": 2,
          "duration_years": 2,
          "first_follow_up_year": 3
        },
        {
          "phase": "offsets_4_5",
          "start_offset": 4,
          "duration_years": 2,
          "first_follow_up_year": 5
        },
        {
          "phase": "offset_6_plus",
          "start_offset": 6,
          "duration_years": null,
          "first_follow_up_year": 7
        }
      ],
      "description": "Source-offset profile: displacement, +1, +2–3, +4–5, and +6+; displacement is follow-up year 1, so offset +6 begins in follow-up year 7. Annual baseline rates use a constant-hazard rate-to-risk conversion; odds ratios modify annual risk, and survival compounds across phases. The selected baseline age rate is held fixed over the follow-up horizon."
    },
    "place_application": "initial_only",
    "place_counterfactual": "national child-dollar result is the reference"
  },
  "exposure_provenance": {
    "source": "one-worker normalized reference input",
    "method": "scale by the stored warehouse worker-equivalent exposure at read time"
  },
  "place": null,
  "place_mix": [],
  "input_content_sha256": "65625244b6014b6429cf6d6fd7f3f525fdafb6dce287e996ad1a82b5db273d17",
  "engine_version": "0.4.0",
  "engine_sha256": "99173fbf23e75037da3fb9b4a9017a1e56909260ccb112f9902bc5ac86242153",
  "adapter_sha256": "605700852536cef19bdae955f055979ab182f352c107882e7b46fb6cccd3e68e",
  "outcomes": {
    "excess_deaths": {
      "point": 2691.8161912740443,
      "low": 1054.149612006903,
      "high": 4688.947172596379,
      "unit": "deaths",
      "baseline": {
        "value": 0.004944,
        "annual_probability": 0.004931798548274205,
        "unit": "deaths_per_person_year",
        "citation": "cdc_wonder D76 (Underlying Cause of Death, 1999-2020), Male 45-54 years, pooled 2015-2019: 514314 deaths / 104024440 person-years = 494.4 per 100k; pulled 2026-09-06 via scraper.cli wonder-mortality into warehouse wonder_mortality",
        "population": "US prime-age men (45-54)",
        "notes": "Pre-pandemic window: excludes 2020 (COVID-distorted; 2020 crude rate 601.5/100k). Single-year 2019 = 490.0/100k. Ages 45-54 match the Sullivan & von Wachter prime-age counterfactual population",
        "sex": "Male",
        "age": "45-54 years",
        "years": "2015-2019",
        "cause": "All causes",
        "geography": "US"
      },
      "steps": [
        {
          "link": "earnings_shock->mortality_peak",
          "phase": "displacement",
          "point": 2.6698,
          "low": 2.1144,
          "high": 3.3711,
          "citation": "sullivan2009",
          "tier": "canonical",
          "population_scope": "US high-seniority displaced men born 1930-1959",
          "evidence_role": "conditional"
        },
        {
          "link": "earnings_shock->mortality_offset_1",
          "phase": "offset_1",
          "point": 1.9838,
          "low": 1.3697,
          "high": 2.8732,
          "citation": "sullivan2009",
          "tier": "canonical",
          "population_scope": "US high-seniority displaced men born 1930-1959",
          "evidence_role": "conditional"
        },
        {
          "link": "earnings_shock->mortality_offsets_2_3",
          "phase": "offsets_2_3",
          "point": 1.7315,
          "low": 1.3238,
          "high": 2.2649,
          "citation": "sullivan2009",
          "tier": "canonical",
          "population_scope": "US high-seniority displaced men born 1930-1959",
          "evidence_role": "conditional"
        },
        {
          "link": "earnings_shock->mortality_offsets_4_5",
          "phase": "offsets_4_5",
          "point": 1.2712,
          "low": 0.97,
          "high": 1.6661,
          "citation": "sullivan2009",
          "tier": "canonical",
          "population_scope": "US high-seniority displaced men born 1930-1959",
          "evidence_role": "conditional"
        },
        {
          "link": "earnings_shock->mortality_sustained",
          "phase": "offset_6_plus",
          "point": 1.1354,
          "low": 1.0335,
          "high": 1.2474,
          "citation": "sullivan2009",
          "tier": "canonical",
          "population_scope": "US high-seniority displaced men born 1930-1959",
          "evidence_role": "conditional"
        }
      ],
      "components": {
        "follow_up_years": 20,
        "method": "odds_survival",
        "timing": "source_profile"
      },
      "applicability": {
        "status": "illustrative_reference_calculation",
        "eligible_for_public_headline": false,
        "target_population": null,
        "decision": null,
        "transport_assumptions": [
          "high-tenure male mass-layoff cohort, ages 45–54",
          "Pennsylvania early-1980s response transported to target place and calendar time",
          "fixed baseline age rate over follow-up; cohort aging is not modeled"
        ],
        "reason": "Target cohort applicability and transport have not been established for this outcome; display as an illustrative reference calculation."
      },
      "interpretation": "Conditional modeled expected difference; parameter bands are support envelopes, not a confidence interval.",
      "persistence_sensitivity": {
        "available": true,
        "status": "declared_structural_sensitivity",
        "eligible_for_public_headline": false,
        "unit": "deaths",
        "variants": {
          "source_profile": {
            "point": 2691.8161912740443,
            "low": 1054.149612006903,
            "high": 4688.947172596379,
            "evidence_status": "source_profile_with_transport_assumptions",
            "citations": [
              "sullivan2009"
            ]
          },
          "no_sustained_excess": {
            "point": 1920.9851157866062,
            "low": 860.2647318338353,
            "high": 3309.8143802210443,
            "evidence_status": "structural_assumption",
            "motivating_citations": [
              "eliasonstorrie2009"
            ],
            "assumption": "Retain source odds through offset +5; set offset +6 onward OR=1.",
            "first_changed_follow_up_year": 7,
            "fixed_late_odds_ratio": 1
          }
        },
        "source_minus_no_sustained_point": 770.831075487438,
        "structural_point_range": {
          "low": 1920.9851157866062,
          "high": 2691.8161912740443,
          "interpretation": "Range of point estimates across these two assumptions; not a confidence interval or a bound on the true effect."
        },
        "shared_inputs": [
          "exposure",
          "resolved mortality baseline",
          "follow-up horizon",
          "source odds through offset +5"
        ],
        "limitations": [
          "No probabilities or model-average weights are assigned to the structures.",
          "A nonsignificant long-run estimate does not establish an exactly zero effect.",
          "The Swedish study differs in population, design, effect scale and follow-up; this hybrid does not reproduce its estimates or substitute its hazard ratios for odds ratios.",
          "The cutoff follows the source profile's offset +6 phase, not the Swedish study's windows; persistence beyond its 12-year follow-up is an assumption in either direction.",
          "Baseline aging and target-population transport remain unresolved in both structures."
        ]
      }
    },
    "child_lifetime_earnings_lost_usd": {
      "point": 44824468855.11267,
      "low": 11642719183.146156,
      "high": 75677674690.44995,
      "steps": [
        {
          "link": "displacement->child_earnings",
          "kind": "direct",
          "citation": "oreopoulos2008",
          "tier": "EXACT",
          "param_point": 0.9076,
          "param_low": 0.844,
          "param_high": 0.976,
          "value_point": 0.9076,
          "value_low": 0.844,
          "value_high": 0.976,
          "causal_role": "direct_displacement_estimate",
          "population_scope": "Canada 39k father-son pairs firm closures",
          "evidence_role": "conditional"
        }
      ],
      "unit": "usd_2024",
      "baseline": {
        "value": 2591418,
        "unit": "usd_2024",
        "citation": "SSA Annual Statistical Supplement 2025, Table 4.B6 (CWHS/Master Earnings File, 1 percent sample): male median earnings by age, 2023 (preliminary) — synthetic career ages 20-64 = 5x(24218+42561+52485+60423+64962+67506+68160+64854)+2x60666+3x56666 = 2517175 usd_2023; CPI-U annual averages 304.702->313.689 (BLS series CUUR0000SA0, pulled 2026-09-06) -> 2591418 usd_2024; warehouse ssa_median_earnings (pulled via ssa-earnings-download)",
        "population": "US male median lifetime earnings",
        "notes": "Derivation declared: the cross-sectional age profile summed over a 45-year working life (ages 20-64) is a synthetic cohort — the sum of age-band medians approximates rather than equals the median of individual lifetime sums; median-of-workers semantics excludes non-working years; 2023 medians are preliminary (SSA replaces them with final data in a later edition)"
      },
      "applicability": {
        "status": "illustrative_reference_calculation",
        "eligible_for_public_headline": false,
        "target_population": null,
        "decision": null,
        "transport_assumptions": [
          "Canadian father-son firm-closure estimate transported to the target families",
          "US male synthetic career earnings convert a relative adult earnings effect to dollars",
          "lifetime dollars are undiscounted; this is not an annual loss"
        ],
        "reason": "Target cohort applicability and transport have not been established for this outcome; display as an illustrative reference calculation."
      },
      "interpretation": "Conditional modeled expected difference; parameter bands are support envelopes, not a confidence interval."
    }
  }
}

Parameter set v1.52 · model v1.52+engine0.4.0+99173fbf23e75037da3fb9b4a9017a1e56909260ccb112f9902bc5ac86242153+national-reference1

Local connections

County context, public notices, and linked public records.

Community well-being

Food insecurity, SNAP receipt, mental distress, smoking, and overdose mortality in this area. CDC models these from survey data: treat them as local estimates, not headcounts. Bars compare each estimate against population-weighted averages of all reporting areas for the same data year.

Food insecurity

2023

13.9%: 1.3 points below U.S.

Households on SNAP

2023

6.3%: 5.5 points below U.S.

Frequent mental distress

2023

17.5%: 1.5 points above U.S.

Adult smoking

2023

8.2%: 3.9 points below U.S.

Drug overdose deaths

2021

43.1: 11.0 above U.S.

Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release (BRFSS survey year 2023) and NCHS drug poisoning mortality. PLACES values are model-based small-area estimates, not survey counts. Benchmarks are population-weighted averages across all reporting areas.

Medical workforce context

AHRF supply DOL filingsRecordAHRF county supply data and H-1B medical LCAs. Comparisons use the median US county.
MDs per 100k residents428↑ 4.7× median
Active MDs (non-federal)5,080
Nurse practitioners per 100k169↑ 76% above
County population1,185,813
Primary care HPSA designations6
H-1B medical workers certifiedhealthcare SOCs (29-* + 31-2*)28736% of BLS
Full medical breakdown

Salt Lake County in context

DOL filings CountyRecordH-1B intensity by county across Utah. This county is highlighted. Click any county to drill in.
Loading map…
Read the county map County-level H-1B intensity

The map gives geographic context. A county average does not classify every filing, employer, or worker within it.

Employers & occupations

The sponsors and job categories recorded in this county.

Employers (3,801)

DOL filings EmployerRecordRanked by applications in this county.
EmployerFilings
1

Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC

3,006
2

University of Utah

2,721
3

Infosys Limited ⚠ Dep

2,158
4

Goldman Sachs Services LLC

1,179
5

Overstock.com, Inc.

899
6

ARUP Laboratories

774
7

Capgemini America Inc. ⚠ Dep

442
8

Tata Consultancy Services Limited ⚠ Dep

306

Job categories (267)

  • Software Developers$180.6M · 19.9%
  • Financial Risk Specialists$126.9M · 14.0%
  • Computer and Information Systems Managers$109.3M · 12.1%
  • Computer Occupations, All Other$108.4M · 12.0%
  • Data Scientists$105.6M · 11.7%
  • Information Security Analysts$94.5M · 10.4%
  • Financial Specialists, All Other$92.2M · 10.2%
  • Financial and Investment Analysts$88.9M · 9.8%
DOL wage offers BLS occupationsSignalOccupation averages need not describe each filing.
Job categoryH-1B vs BLS
15-1252 Software DevelopersH-1B $121.3K vs BLS $136K-11%

6,165 workers · 2,196 filings · $180.6M wage theft

13-2054 Financial Risk SpecialistsH-1B $79.2K vs BLS $117.3K-32%

3,328 workers · 357 filings · $126.9M wage theft

1,522 workers · 444 filings · $109.3M wage theft

15-1299 Computer Occupations, All OtherH-1B $101.1K vs BLS $116.6K-13%

3,089 workers · 460 filings · $108.4M wage theft

15-2051 Data ScientistsH-1B $98.8K vs BLS $120.2K-18%

3,687 workers · 548 filings · $105.6M wage theft

15-1212 Information Security AnalystsH-1B $109.8K vs BLS $129.2K-15%

2,139 workers · 58 filings · $94.5M wage theft

13-2099 Financial Specialists, All OtherH-1B $69.8K vs BLS $81.1K-14%

4,193 workers · 854 filings · $92.2M wage theft

13-2051 Financial and Investment AnalystsH-1B $76.7K vs BLS $102.7K-25%

3,263 workers · 569 filings · $88.9M wage theft

Labor condition applications (31,421)

DOL filings BLS occupationsRecordAll recorded outcomes and visa classes. Use the wage badge to inspect an offer against available benchmarks.
Title · Worksite

A negative % sits below the BLS market median; a positive % sits above.

What the filing rows show One application per row

Each row links to the disclosure record. A wage comparison is a screening calculation, not a finding of a wage violation.

WARN notices (0)Public layoff notices: open to inspect
WARN EmployerReviewOpen a notice to inspect its stated effective date and worker count. Coverage varies by state; some states file no public WARN data.

No WARN notices on record.

Records to inspect

Open the linked public records behind this county's filings.

Immigration law firms (1,013)

DOL filings Law firmRecordNames are shown as recorded.

Federal contracts (6,750)

Federal awards EmployerRecordAmounts are individual award actions, not total contract values.
OUR RESCUE
Department of Health and Human Services · Aug 7, 2026
$158.1M
L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Department of Defense · Mar 19, 2026
$50M
L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Department of Defense · May 11, 2026
$30.5M
RIO TINTO SERVICES INC
Department of Defense · Feb 19, 2026
$24.8M
RIO TINTO SERVICES INC
Department of Defense · Apr 17, 2026
$24.8M
L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Department of Defense · Nov 20, 2025
$22M
HEALTHEQUITY, INC.
Office of Personnel Management · Mar 10, 2026
$22M
L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Department of Defense · Mar 17, 2026
$18M

Evidence & sources

Scope, methods, and source coverage for this county record.

Public source records and site analysis. We do not attest to accuracy. Read the full disclaimer.

Dataset guides and site methods

  1. [1] Dataset documentation · DOL OFLC. LCA public disclosure record layout (FY2026 Q3). Pages 1–4: application, DOL outcome and dates, requested positions, employer, representatives, worksites and pay unitsThis layout covers determinations issued October 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026. It documents employer-provided application fields and DOL decisions, not USCIS decisions, payroll verification, legal bills or worker-linked moves. Older layouts can differ.Checked 2026-10-17.
  2. [2] Dataset documentation · BLS. OEWS technical notes (May 2025). Scope of the survey; occupational coding; concepts and estimation methodologyDocuments occupation and geographic wage estimates, not an individual worker’s pay. Use the estimate year and geography stated by the site; older releases can differ.Checked 2026-10-17.
  3. [3] XH1B method or registry · XH1B. WARN Notices (mass layoffs): source registry; Calculation and Matching Methods; Reading Public Records and Derived Indicators. Source registry entry: warn; Filing units, annualization, weighting, wage comparisons, and inference limits; Reading records: units, source coverage, wage gaps, entity links, and inference limitsXH1B dataset description: One row per source_notice_id. The definition of a mass layoff and the layoff threshold vary by state. The threshold is typically 50 or more employees.; These are the site's review methods, not validated predictions of wrongdoing. Inspect underlying records and alternative explanations.
  4. [4] Dataset documentation · USAspending / U.S. Treasury. Federal Spending Guide: contract transactions. Pages 3, 5, 9 and 17: transactions, amount fields and recipient identifiersContract downloads contain prime award transactions. XH1B’s use of recipient identifiers for employer links is its own processing step.Checked 2026-10-18.
  5. [5] XH1B method or registry · XH1B. Displacement Model and Assumptions. Eligibility, requested-position weighting, scopes, WARN matching, and counting limitsModel outputs are estimates. A matched layoff notice does not prove that an H-1B worker replaced a laid-off worker.
  6. [6] XH1B method or registry · XH1B. Downstream Research and Methods. Study populations, parameter bounds, baselines, and expected outcomes; linked model card
  7. [7] Dataset documentation · HRSA. Area Health Resources Files: 2024–2025 technical documentation. County User Guide: physicians, Table 10 NPI professions, population estimates and missing values; Technical Documentation: variable years and sourcesClinician categories and variable years differ. County APRN counts use NPI taxonomy; physician active and federal status matter. Release year is not the year of every measure.Checked 2026-10-18.
Questions about the data & methods

How many H-1B filings are in Salt Lake County, UT?

29,389 H-1B labor condition applications requesting 73,834 workers have been filed in Salt Lake County, UT, per Department of Labor disclosure records.

How many employers have H-1B filings in Salt Lake County, UT?

3,542 distinct employers have filed H-1B labor condition applications in Salt Lake County, UT. The employer list on this page is ranked by filings and wage impact.

What worker-equivalent exposure does the displacement model estimate for Salt Lake County, UT?

The model estimates 93,600 worker-equivalents of displacement exposure in Salt Lake County, UT: one per requested worker on a certified H-1B filing, raised where the offered wage sits below the occupation's BLS median, plus government-reported WARN layoffs matched to filings. This is a modeled exposure estimate, not a count of documented job losses; the formula is on the About page.

Who files the most H-1B filings in Salt Lake County, UT?

GOLDMAN SACHS & CO. LLC leads with 3,006 filings, about 10% of all Salt Lake County, UT filings. Its dossier page carries the full filing, wage, and layoff history.

What share of Salt Lake County, UT H-1B filings does DOL deny?

DOL disclosure records show 28,853 certified, 461 denied, 711 withdrawn of 30,025 labor condition applications with reported outcomes in Salt Lake County, UT. The denial share is 2% across the reported outcomes.

When did H-1B use peak in Salt Lake County, UT?

Filings peaked in 2019 at 2,832 labor condition applications. The filings-by-year chart on this page shows the full trend since records began.

Which immigration law firms file the most H-1B filings in Salt Lake County, UT?

1,013 distinct law firms and agents have filed H-1B applications for employers in Salt Lake County, UT. The law-firm table on this page ranks them by filings and by the wage gap their filings carry.

Do Salt Lake County, UT H-1B employers hold federal contracts?

6,750 federal contract actions in Salt Lake County, UT name employers that also file H-1B labor condition applications. The contracts table links each award to the employer dossier. A shared employer name does not show how award funds were spent.

Where does the Salt Lake County, UT H-1B data come from?

Every figure on this page traces to a public government record: DOL OFLC disclosure files (LCA filings, wages, outcomes), BLS OES wage data (occupation medians), state WARN notices, and federal contract awards. The archive is read-only evidence; nothing is crowdsourced or anonymous.