Occupation

13-1079

SOC 13-1079Standard Occupational Classification

Employers submitted 162 certified H-1B applications for SOC 13-1079 roles, requesting 207 workers. The average offered wage is $52,823/yr; the average prevailing wage on these filings is $48,112/yr. The largest filers are United Cellular Inc., Lauraine Murphy JERICHO, Inc. and Hallmark Aviation Services, LLP.

Source import recorded Sep 2, 2026

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC) · Bulk disclosure files downloaded quarterly from DOL · Source import recorded Sep 2, 2026

What the records contain / DOL LCA disclosures

What XH1B calculates / Wage comparisons

How to read these figures

Offered and prevailing wages are employer-reported on each DOL filing, annualized to year rates. The average mixes experience levels, localities, and years.

The benchmark is the BLS Occupational Employment Statistics national median for this occupation, latest available year. An average set against a median: a few very high offers pull the average up.

A certified filing is an approved application, not a confirmed hire. These comparisons are screening measures, not wage-law findings.

Data sources & methodology ↗

Signed gaps: a negative % sits below the benchmark; a positive % sits above.

Wage evidence

What filings for this occupation offer against the BLS benchmark.

Offered wage vs BLS median by year

Median offered wage moved from $45,054 in 2010 to $86,276 in 2013. The dashed line is the BLS national median for the occupation.

$0K$10K$20K$30K$40K$50K$60K$70K$80KInfosys pays record $34M visa-fraud settlement (ICE/DOJ): https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/indian-corporation-pays-record-34-million-fine-settle-allegations-systemic-visa-fraudInfosys pays record $34M vi…2010: $45,054/yr median offer (47 filings)2011: $51,938/yr median offer (92 filings)2012: $63,083/yr median offer (2 filings)2013: $86,276/yr median offer (2 filings)2010201120122013median wage

Offered-wage distribution

06131925$33K$38K$42K$47K$51K$56K$60K$65K$69K$74K$78K$83Kannual wagefilings

Offered-wage percentiles (n=149)

$33,756$45,798$57,839$69,880$81,922$50,614annual wage
Context & calculation noteswage definitions and benchmark scope

Offered and prevailing wages are employer-reported on each DOL filing, annualized to year rates. The average mixes experience levels, localities, and years.

The benchmark is the BLS Occupational Employment Statistics national median for this occupation (U.S.), latest available year. The average is set against a median, so a few very high offers pull the average up.

The distribution and percentiles cover annualized offers only; filings with hourly or other wage units sit outside them.

A certified filing is an approved labor condition application, not a confirmed hire. The comparisons on this page are screening measures, not wage-law findings.

Data sources & methodology ↗

Employers & filings

Who files, and the certified records behind every figure on this page. Filing wage badges use the latest national BLS median. Their detail shows the benchmark code and year. A mapped comparator can use a different occupation from the direct-code profile benchmark above. It is a screening comparison, not a claim that the occupations are identical.

Top employers (148)

EmployerFilings
1

United Cellular Inc.

$42.2K avg

5
2

Lauraine Murphy JERICHO, Inc.

$44.7K avg

4
3

Hallmark Aviation Services, LLP

$28.4K avg

4
4

IBM Corporation

$79.4K avg

4
5

Dell USA LP

$88.7K avg

4
6

UDT Distribution Corp.

$45.9K avg

4
7

Warner Music Group Corp.

$39.9K avg

3
8

Barclays Services Corp.

$56.7K avg

3

LCA filings (162)

Title · Worksite

A negative % sits below the BLS market median; a positive % sits above.

FAQ

Questions about the data & methods

What is SOC code 13-1079?

13-1079 is the federal Standard Occupational Classification code for 13-1079. The government assigns every H-1B filing one of these codes, so filings can be studied by occupation.

How many H-1B filings are there for 13-1079?

162 H-1B labor condition applications name this occupation, requesting 207 workers, per Department of Labor disclosure records.

How much do 13-1079 H-1B workers get paid?

The average wage offered on H-1B filings for this occupation is $52,823 per year.

Which companies hire the most 13-1079 workers on H-1B visas?

The largest filers on this page include United Cellular Inc., Lauraine Murphy JERICHO, Inc. and Hallmark Aviation Services, LLP. The employer table ranks every employer in this occupation by filings and wage impact.

SOC code 13-1079 data sourced from DOL LCA disclosures and BLS Occupational Employment Statistics. About our sources →

Public source records and site analysis. We do not attest to accuracy. Read the full disclaimer.

Dataset guides and site methods

  1. [1] Dataset documentation · DOL OFLC. LCA public disclosure record layout (FY2026 Q3). Pages 1–4: application, DOL outcome and dates, requested positions, employer, representatives, worksites and pay unitsThis layout covers determinations issued October 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026. It documents employer-provided application fields and DOL decisions, not USCIS decisions, payroll verification, legal bills or worker-linked moves. Older layouts can differ.Checked 2026-10-17.
  2. [2] Dataset documentation · BLS. OEWS technical notes (May 2025). Scope of the survey; occupational coding; concepts and estimation methodologyDocuments occupation and geographic wage estimates, not an individual worker’s pay. Use the estimate year and geography stated by the site; older releases can differ.Checked 2026-10-17.
  3. [3] Guidance · BLS. Standard Occupational Classification. Classification Principles 1–2 and Coding Guideline 2; job duties, not job titlesChecked 2026-10-08.
  4. [4] XH1B method or registry · XH1B. Calculation and Matching Methods; Reading Public Records and Derived Indicators. Filing units, annualization, weighting, wage comparisons, and inference limits; Reading records: units, source coverage, wage gaps, entity links, and inference limitsThese are the site's review methods, not validated predictions of wrongdoing. Inspect underlying records and alternative explanations.