Read the record summary
Allisonterry is listed on 1 H-1B labor condition application for 1 employer. The average annual offered wage is $76,045/year. These are filing wage offers, not payroll observations.
Source import recorded Sep 2, 2026
What the records contain / DOL labor condition applications
What XH1B calculates / Comparisons & modeled estimates
How to read these figures
Certified H-1B headline counts differ from the all-outcome client and recent-record lists. Median wages use records with a reported yearly wage. Mean wages and BLS comparisons use the certified filing summary. Modeled exposure is not an observed count of job losses.
Definitions & methodologyRead the firm record
Certified H-1B filing history
DOL records name Allisonterry in 1 certified H-1B LCA with reported wages across 1 employer.
Clients and concentration
The client table contains 1 linked employer record across all LCA outcomes and visa classes.
The largest linked employer is CD II Fashions LLC, with 1 firm-linked filing.
Latest recorded filing year
Submission year 2018 records 1 filing and 1 worker request. The latest year can be incomplete.
Client industry mix
Wholesale Trade (NAICS 42) has the most filings: 1, or 100% of 1 records with a usable industry code.
The leading occupation is ENGINEERING TECHNICIANS, EXCEPT DRAFTERS, ALL (SOC 17-3029), with 1 firm-linked filing.
Offered wages and BLS comparisons
Too few yearly wage records are available for a wage distribution.
The stored model population includes 1 certified H-1B filing. The offered wage is below the BLS occupation median in 1 filing. This population also includes filings without reported wages.
The all-outcome employer-linked matched sample compares 1 unflagged filing with national BLS occupation medians as of each filing year. Records without a filing date use the latest loaded national survey. Latest benchmark year in this scope: 2018. Offered wages are below the benchmark in 0 filings. Eligible positive-wage records without a usable benchmark: 0 filings.
Matched names and source coverage
This page describes 1 source spelling found in source records. No approved firm identity is attached to this name.
The recent preview contains 1 recent source record. It is not the full archive.
About these record populations
This headline excludes records flagged for data quality. LCA certification does not establish a USCIS approval, a hire, or a current vacancy.
Annual totals include H-1B filings across outcomes and exclude records flagged for data quality. Coverage can differ by year. The latest year can be incomplete.
Industry totals include all LCA outcomes and visa classes. They describe employer filings, not the location or services of the law firm.
Yearly wage percentiles and annualized client averages can use different records. A BLS comparison is a benchmark, not a legal finding or a measure of wages paid.
Source listings show a filing relationship. They do not establish who signed a filing, current firm membership, or misconduct.
Filing activity
Annual totals include H-1B records with all outcomes. They exclude records with data quality flags. The latest year can be incomplete. Requested workers are not confirmed hires.
Offered-wage distribution
No records are available for this section.
Model & sources
Calculated exposure from firm-linked filings; not observed job losses
Modeled displacement exposure
1
The math
1 of 1 filings below BLS median
. The 1.0 base rate per certified H-1B worker request is a site model assumption. Wage gap multiplier = (BLS median − offered wage) / BLS median, applied only to filings offering less than the BLS median. Related research provides context, not validation of these exact coefficients. This is a modeled estimate, not a count of actual displacements.
Exposure method v1.2 · This is a modeled worker-equivalent count.
Source coverage
Browse data sources →DOL filing records
The certified headline counts H-1B filings with reported wages and excludes flagged records. The model population also includes filings without reported wages. Client, listed-name, industry, and recent-record lists include all LCA outcomes and visa classes.
Offered wages & BLS
Percentiles use positive wages reported per year. Matched means use eligible annualized wages across outcomes. Reported client means can include other wage units and large converted values. Inspect the filing status and original unit.
Matched names & listed people
Matched firm spellings combine related source records. A name in a filing does not prove current firm membership. Unresolved person names remain separate from resolved people.
Latest decision in this firm record: 2018-10-04. The header update date describes the wider dataset.
Inspect 1 matched source spellings
These are the approved member spellings or the single unresolved source name. Counts describe different certified populations. Years use the H-1B submission series. A missing value is not zero.
| Source spelling | Certified with wages | Model population | Submission years | Calculated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALLISONTERRY | 1 | 1 | 2018–2018 | 2026-11-04 |
Matched wage records: 1. Missing usable benchmarks: 0. BLS year: 2018. Calculated: 2026-10-27T08:15:21.894Z.
DOL filings can name an attorney or agent. This page groups those listed names. A listed name does not prove who signed a filing or whether anyone broke a rule. For attorneys →
Recent source records (1)
This is a recent-record window, not the full archive. It includes all LCA outcomes and visa classes. Counts and sorting apply to this window.
Explore full history · Recent preview
A negative % sits below the BLS market median; a positive % sits above.
Firm and client court records
A filing or a named party does not establish wrongdoing. Direct firm records require an explicit active identity match to the named court party. A lawyer listed as counsel does not make the firm a party. Client cases stay separate.
Cases naming the matched firm as a party
0 matching records
No matching records in this archive.
Cases naming matched clients as parties
These cases name employer records in active same-entity client groups. They are client evidence, not cases against the firm. Court coverage is limited to the archived federal dockets.
0 matching records
No matching records in this archive.
Wages & industries
Client wages use matched records. Industry totals include all outcomes. The model uses its separate certified H-1B population.
Client industries
- Wholesale Trade (NAICS 42)1 · 100.0%
All recorded sectors with a usable industry code. Filings include all LCA outcomes and visa classes.
| Industry sector | Filings | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Wholesale TradeNAICS 42 | 1 | 100.0% |
1 filings with a usable industry code. All recorded sectors are included.
Offered wages against BLS
- Matched offered mean
- $76,045
- Mean matched BLS median
- $63,200
- Offered vs BLS median
- +20%
- Filings below BLS
- 100%
The headline counts certified H-1B filings with reported wages. Matched client wage means use the same eligible source records. The model uses a separate certified population and does not measure observed job losses.
Percentiles use positive wages reported per year. Matched means use eligible annualized wages across outcomes. Reported client means can include other wage units and large converted values. Inspect the filing status and original unit.
Client wage comparisons
All outcomes and visa classes; flagged records are excluded from wage comparisons. Both means use the same filings with a positive annualized offer and positive national BLS median. Each record uses its reported SOC and the latest survey at or before its filing year. Records without a filing date use the latest loaded national survey. Missing benchmarks do not count as zero gaps.
Default order: number of individual filings below BLS. Annual shortfall sums positive benchmark minus offered wage once per filing, without multiplying by worker requests. It is not a measure of wages paid.
| Compared filings | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CD II Fashions LLCWage sample and filing dates
| 1 | 10 missing benchmarksSmall sample | 0 | $0 | $76,045Mean BLS median $63,200 · latest year 2018+20% |
Full filing history
Client filing worksite states, not firm offices. Filing counts include all outcomes and visa classes. Worker totals and wage comparisons exclude flagged records. Unknown source states remain visible.
Occupations in firm-linked filings
Full-history canonical SOC groups. Counts include every outcome. Worker totals and wage comparisons exclude flagged records. Offered and BLS means use the same positive matched records. Raw SOC values remain on source records.
| Occupation | Firm-linked filings | Worker requests | Compared filings | Matched offered mean | Mean BLS median / latest year | Below BLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENGINEERING TECHNICIANS, EXCEPT DRAFTERS, ALL (17-3029)Occupation profileOutcomes and wage sample
| 1 | 1 | 1 | $76,045 | $63,2002018 | 0 |
Annual filing outcomes
Calendar year of the decision date. Counts include all outcomes and visa classes. Worker totals sum reported requests and exclude flagged records. Medians use positive annualized offered wages and exclude flagged records. Missing years are not confirmed zeroes.
| Decision year | Firm-linked filings | Worker requests | Certified | Certified–withdrawn | Denied | Withdrawn | Other / unknown | Median offered wage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018Outcomes and wage sample
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $76,045 |
Client filing worksites
Client filing worksite states, not firm offices. Filing counts include all outcomes and visa classes. Worker totals and wage comparisons exclude flagged records. Unknown source states remain visible.
| Worksite state | Firm-linked filings | Worker requests | Compared filings | Matched offered mean | Mean BLS median / latest year | Below BLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New York (NY)Outcomes and wage sample
| 1 | 1 | 1 | $76,045 | $63,2002018 | 0 |
Compare the same work and year
Each row groups the same canonical occupation and decision calendar year. Both wage means use the same positive, unflagged offers. Each filing uses its reported SOC and the latest positive national BLS median at or before its filing year. Records without a filing date use the latest loaded national survey. All outcomes and visa classes are included.
Decision year 2018 · SOC 17-3029 · Sorted by compared filing count. This is a sample comparison, not a ranking of firm quality.
| Firm | Compared filings | Below-BLS share | Matched offered mean | Offered vs BLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AllisonterryThis firmSmall sampleDetails
| 1 | 0.0%0 / 1 | $76,045 | 20.3% |
Questions about the data & methods
Does Allisonterry file H-1B filings?
Yes. Allisonterry is named on 1 H-1B labor condition application across 1 employer, per Department of Labor disclosure records.
How many employers use Allisonterry for H-1B filings?
1 employer has filed H-1B filings naming Allisonterry, totaling 1 filing.
What does Allisonterry do in the H-1B process?
The disclosure names the firm associated with the attorney or agent on the H-1B labor condition application. This links the firm to the filing. It does not establish who signed the employer declaration or prove misconduct.
What wage data is on record for Allisonterry's H-1B filings?
Certified H-1B filings with reported wages have a mean annualized offered wage of $76,045. Flagged records are excluded. In the separate model-certified population, 100% offer below BLS. That population includes filings without reported wages. Offered wages are source values, not a measure of wages paid.
Which linked employer has the most LCA filings naming Allisonterry?
CD II Fashions LLC leads the client list with 1 firm-linked LCA filing across all outcomes and visa classes.
How many names are listed as attorneys or agents for Allisonterry?
The source-name table contains 1 group linked to Allisonterry. These groups can contain people, organization names, or unresolved names. A listing does not prove a signature or current firm membership.
What worker-equivalent exposure does the model assign to filings naming Allisonterry?
The model assigns about 1 worker-equivalent exposures to certified filings that name Allisonterry. This is not a count of documented job losses or a finding against the firm. Each employer's page shows its own breakdown.
How can I report misconduct involving Allisonterry?
Current or former employees, clients, and contractors can file a confidential tip on the XH1B whistleblower page. Reports are timestamped and hash-sealed on arrival, and they support investigations into H-1B program abuse.
Public source records and site analysis. We do not attest to accuracy. Read the full disclaimer.
Dataset guides and site methods
- [1] Dataset documentation · DOL OFLC. LCA public disclosure record layout (FY2026 Q3). Pages 1–4: application, DOL outcome and dates, requested positions, employer, representatives, worksites and pay unitsThis layout covers determinations issued October 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026. It documents employer-provided application fields and DOL decisions, not USCIS decisions, payroll verification, legal bills or worker-linked moves. Older layouts can differ.Checked 2026-10-17.
- [2] Dataset documentation · BLS. OEWS technical notes (May 2025). Scope of the survey; occupational coding; concepts and estimation methodologyDocuments occupation and geographic wage estimates, not an individual worker’s pay. Use the estimate year and geography stated by the site; older releases can differ.Checked 2026-10-17.
- [3] Dataset documentation · Free Law Project. PACER Data APIs: dockets, parties and attorneys. Overview; Dockets; Parties; AttorneysExplains linked docket, entry, document, party and attorney objects. Missing matches or documents are not evidence that no case or filing exists.Checked 2026-10-18.
- [4] XH1B method or registry · XH1B. Calculation and Matching Methods; Reading Public Records and Derived Indicators. Filing units, annualization, weighting, wage comparisons, and inference limits; Reading records: units, source coverage, wage gaps, entity links, and inference limitsThese are the site's review methods, not validated predictions of wrongdoing. Inspect underlying records and alternative explanations.
- [5] XH1B method or registry · XH1B. Displacement Model and Assumptions. Eligibility, requested-position weighting, scopes, WARN matching, and counting limitsModel outputs are estimates. A matched layoff notice does not prove that an H-1B worker replaced a laid-off worker.
- [6] XH1B method or registry · XH1B. Downstream Research and Methods. Study populations, parameter bounds, baselines, and expected outcomes; linked model card