Law firm records

Michelleburns

Name listed in source recordsRecord years 2018–2018Source coverageCompare firms
Read the record summary

Michelleburns is listed on 16 H-1B labor condition applications for 1 employer. The average annual offered wage is $131,768/year. These are filing wage offers, not payroll observations.

Source import recorded Sep 2, 2026

What the records contain / DOL labor condition applications

What XH1B calculates / Comparisons & modeled estimates

How to read these figures

Certified H-1B headline counts differ from the all-outcome client and recent-record lists. Median wages use records with a reported yearly wage. Mean wages and BLS comparisons use the certified filing summary. Modeled exposure is not an observed count of job losses.

Definitions & methodology

Read the firm record

Certified H-1B filing history

DOL records name Michelleburns in 16 certified H-1B LCAs with reported wages across 1 employer.

Clients and concentration

The client table contains 1 linked employer record across all LCA outcomes and visa classes.

The largest linked employer is IBM Corporation, with 16 firm-linked filings.

Latest recorded filing year

Submission year 2018 records 16 filings and 16 worker requests. The latest year can be incomplete.

Client industry mix

Professional / Scientific / Tech (NAICS 54) has the most filings: 16, or 100% of 16 records with a usable industry code.

The leading occupation is COMPUTER OCCUPATIONS, ALL OTHER (SOC 15-1299), with 6 firm-linked filings.

Offered wages and BLS comparisons

The median offered wage is $134,228.5/year across 16 filings with positive wages reported per year. This sample includes all LCA outcomes and visa classes.

The stored model population includes 16 certified H-1B filings. The offered wage is below the BLS occupation median in 6 filings. This population also includes filings without reported wages.

The all-outcome employer-linked matched sample compares 16 unflagged filings with national BLS occupation medians as of each filing year. Records without a filing date use the latest loaded national survey. Latest benchmark year in this scope: 2018. Offered wages are below the benchmark in 2 filings. Eligible positive-wage records without a usable benchmark: 0 filings.

IBM Corporation contributes the largest client count below BLS: 2 filings. These are source comparisons, not findings about wages paid.

Matched names and source coverage

This page describes 1 source spelling found in source records. No approved firm identity is attached to this name.

The recent preview contains 16 recent source records. It is not the full archive.

About these record populations

This headline excludes records flagged for data quality. LCA certification does not establish a USCIS approval, a hire, or a current vacancy.

Annual totals include H-1B filings across outcomes and exclude records flagged for data quality. Coverage can differ by year. The latest year can be incomplete.

Industry totals include all LCA outcomes and visa classes. They describe employer filings, not the location or services of the law firm.

Yearly wage percentiles and annualized client averages can use different records. A BLS comparison is a benchmark, not a legal finding or a measure of wages paid.

Source listings show a filing relationship. They do not establish who signed a filing, current firm membership, or misconduct.

Filing activity

02468101214162018: 16 filings; 16 workers requested20182018: 16filings / worker requests
filings / worker requestsWorkers requested

Annual totals include H-1B records with all outcomes. They exclude records with data quality flags. The latest year can be incomplete. Requested workers are not confirmed hires.

Offered-wage distribution

Median offered wage
$134,229
10th percentile
$105,342
90th percentile
$153,648
$101,477$115,486$129,495$143,504$157,513$134,229annual wage

16 records with a reported yearly wage. Includes all LCA outcomes and visa classes.

Model & sources

Calculated exposure from firm-linked filings; not observed job losses

Modeled displacement exposure

17

The math
Base (1 per certified worker)
+16
Wage-gap multiplier

6 of 16 filings below BLS median

+1
Total17

. The 1.0 base rate per certified H-1B worker request is a site model assumption. Wage gap multiplier = (BLS median − offered wage) / BLS median, applied only to filings offering less than the BLS median. Related research provides context, not validation of these exact coefficients. This is a modeled estimate, not a count of actual displacements.

Exposure method v1.3 · This is a modeled worker-equivalent count.

DOL filing records

The certified headline counts H-1B filings with reported wages and excludes flagged records. The model population also includes filings without reported wages. Client, listed-name, industry, and recent-record lists include all LCA outcomes and visa classes.

Offered wages & BLS

Percentiles use positive wages reported per year. Matched means use eligible annualized wages across outcomes. Reported client means can include other wage units and large converted values. Inspect the filing status and original unit.

Matched names & listed people

Matched firm spellings combine related source records. A name in a filing does not prove current firm membership. Unresolved person names remain separate from resolved people.

Latest decision in this firm record: 2018-12-11. The header update date describes the wider dataset.

Inspect 1 matched source spellings

These are the approved member spellings or the single unresolved source name. Counts describe different certified populations. Years use the H-1B submission series. A missing value is not zero.

Source spellingCertified with wagesModel populationSubmission yearsCalculated
MICHELLEBURNS16162018–20182026-11-09

Matched wage records: 16. Missing usable benchmarks: 0. BLS year: 2018. Calculated: 2026-10-27T08:15:21.894Z.

DOL filings can name an attorney or agent. This page groups those listed names. A listed name does not prove who signed a filing or whether anyone broke a rule. For attorneys →

Firm and client court records

A filing or a named party does not establish wrongdoing. Direct firm records require an explicit active identity match to the named court party. A lawyer listed as counsel does not make the firm a party. Client cases stay separate.

Cases naming the matched firm as a party

0 matching records

No matching records in this archive.

    Cases naming matched clients as parties

    These cases name employer records in active same-entity client groups. They are client evidence, not cases against the firm. Court coverage is limited to the archived federal dockets.

    34 matching records

    Other firms in matched client records

    These links use active same-entity employer groups and active firm matches. A shared client does not establish coordination, shared ownership, or wrongdoing. Counts describe source filings, not legal bills or unique workers.

    6 matching records

    Wages & industries

    Client wages use matched records. Industry totals include all outcomes. The model uses its separate certified H-1B population.

    Client industries

    • Professional / Scientific / Tech (NAICS 54)16 · 100.0%

    All recorded sectors with a usable industry code. Filings include all LCA outcomes and visa classes.

    Industry sectorFilingsShare
    Professional / Scientific / TechNAICS 5416100.0%

    16 filings with a usable industry code. All recorded sectors are included.

    Offered wages against BLS

    Matched offered mean
    $131,768
    Mean matched BLS median
    $95,740
    Offered vs BLS median
    +38%
    Filings below BLS
    38%

    The headline counts certified H-1B filings with reported wages. Matched client wage means use the same eligible source records. The model uses a separate certified population and does not measure observed job losses.

    Percentiles use positive wages reported per year. Matched means use eligible annualized wages across outcomes. Reported client means can include other wage units and large converted values. Inspect the filing status and original unit.

    Client wage comparisons

    All outcomes and visa classes; flagged records are excluded from wage comparisons. Both means use the same filings with a positive annualized offer and positive national BLS median. Each record uses its reported SOC and the latest survey at or before its filing year. Records without a filing date use the latest loaded national survey. Missing benchmarks do not count as zero gaps.

    Default order: number of individual filings below BLS. Annual shortfall sums positive benchmark minus offered wage once per filing, without multiplying by worker requests. It is not a measure of wages paid.

    Compared filings
    IBM Corporation
    Wage sample and filing dates
    First decision
    2018-10-01
    Latest decision
    2018-12-11
    Compared filings
    16 · 0 missing benchmarks
    Annual shortfall
    $21,137
    Matched offered mean
    $131,768
    Mean BLS occupation median
    $95,740 · 2018
    Employer profile
    16160 missing benchmarks2$21,137$131,768Mean BLS median $95,740 · latest year 2018+38%
    Definitions & methodology →

    Full filing history

    Client filing worksite states, not firm offices. Filing counts include all outcomes and visa classes. Worker totals and wage comparisons exclude flagged records. Unknown source states remain visible.

    Occupations in firm-linked filings

    Full-history canonical SOC groups. Counts include every outcome. Worker totals and wage comparisons exclude flagged records. Offered and BLS means use the same positive matched records. Raw SOC values remain on source records.

    OccupationFirm-linked filingsWorker requestsCompared filingsMatched offered meanMean BLS median / latest yearBelow BLS
    COMPUTER OCCUPATIONS, ALL OTHER (15-1299)Occupation profile
    Outcomes and wage sample
    Worker requests
    6
    Certified
    6
    Certified–withdrawn
    0
    Denied
    0
    Withdrawn
    0
    Other / unknown
    0
    Median offered wage
    $140,290
    Compared filings
    6
    Matched offered mean
    $136,451
    Mean BLS median / latest year
    $90,270
    Below BLS
    0
    666$136,451$90,27020180
    COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSTS (15-1211)Occupation profile
    Outcomes and wage sample
    Worker requests
    4
    Certified
    4
    Certified–withdrawn
    0
    Denied
    0
    Withdrawn
    0
    Other / unknown
    0
    Median offered wage
    $150,972
    Compared filings
    4
    Matched offered mean
    $148,048
    Mean BLS median / latest year
    $88,740
    Below BLS
    0
    444$148,048$88,74020180
    SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS, SYSTEMS SOFTWARE (15-1252)Occupation profile
    Outcomes and wage sample
    Worker requests
    4
    Certified
    2
    Certified–withdrawn
    2
    Denied
    0
    Withdrawn
    0
    Other / unknown
    0
    Median offered wage
    $105,342
    Compared filings
    4
    Matched offered mean
    $115,709
    Mean BLS median / latest year
    $105,215
    Below BLS
    2
    444$115,709$105,21520182
    COMPUTER HARDWARE ENGINEERS (17-2061)Occupation profile
    Outcomes and wage sample
    Worker requests
    1
    Certified
    1
    Certified–withdrawn
    0
    Denied
    0
    Withdrawn
    0
    Other / unknown
    0
    Median offered wage
    $126,168
    Compared filings
    1
    Matched offered mean
    $126,168
    Mean BLS median / latest year
    $114,600
    Below BLS
    0
    111$126,168$114,60020180
    MATERIALS SCIENTISTS (19-2032)Occupation profile
    Outcomes and wage sample
    Worker requests
    1
    Certified
    1
    Certified–withdrawn
    0
    Denied
    0
    Withdrawn
    0
    Other / unknown
    0
    Median offered wage
    $108,389
    Compared filings
    1
    Matched offered mean
    $108,389
    Mean BLS median / latest year
    $99,800
    Below BLS
    0
    111$108,389$99,80020180

    Annual filing outcomes

    Calendar year of the decision date. Counts include all outcomes and visa classes. Worker totals sum reported requests and exclude flagged records. Medians use positive annualized offered wages and exclude flagged records. Missing years are not confirmed zeroes.

    Decision yearFirm-linked filingsWorker requestsCertifiedCertified–withdrawnDeniedWithdrawnOther / unknownMedian offered wage
    2018
    Outcomes and wage sample
    Worker requests
    16
    Certified
    14
    Certified–withdrawn
    2
    Denied
    0
    Withdrawn
    0
    Other / unknown
    0
    Median offered wage
    $134,229
    Compared filings
    16
    Matched offered mean
    $131,768
    Mean BLS median / latest year
    $95,740
    Below BLS
    2
    1616142000$134,229

    Client filing worksites

    Client filing worksite states, not firm offices. Filing counts include all outcomes and visa classes. Worker totals and wage comparisons exclude flagged records. Unknown source states remain visible.

    Worksite stateFirm-linked filingsWorker requestsCompared filingsMatched offered meanMean BLS median / latest yearBelow BLS
    New Jersey (NJ)
    Outcomes and wage sample
    Worker requests
    3
    Certified
    3
    Certified–withdrawn
    0
    Denied
    0
    Withdrawn
    0
    Other / unknown
    0
    Median offered wage
    $153,648
    Compared filings
    3
    Matched offered mean
    $145,492
    Mean BLS median / latest year
    $90,270
    Below BLS
    0
    333$145,492$90,27020180
    Texas (TX)
    Outcomes and wage sample
    Worker requests
    3
    Certified
    2
    Certified–withdrawn
    1
    Denied
    0
    Withdrawn
    0
    Other / unknown
    0
    Median offered wage
    $150,972
    Compared filings
    3
    Matched offered mean
    $135,578
    Mean BLS median / latest year
    $95,827
    Below BLS
    1
    333$135,578$95,82720181
    California (CA)
    Outcomes and wage sample
    Worker requests
    2
    Certified
    2
    Certified–withdrawn
    0
    Denied
    0
    Withdrawn
    0
    Other / unknown
    0
    Median offered wage
    $125,469
    Compared filings
    2
    Matched offered mean
    $125,469
    Mean BLS median / latest year
    $89,505
    Below BLS
    0
    222$125,469$89,50520180
    Minnesota (MN)
    Outcomes and wage sample
    Worker requests
    2
    Certified
    2
    Certified–withdrawn
    0
    Denied
    0
    Withdrawn
    0
    Other / unknown
    0
    Median offered wage
    $135,286
    Compared filings
    2
    Matched offered mean
    $135,286
    Mean BLS median / latest year
    $90,270
    Below BLS
    0
    222$135,286$90,27020180
    New York (NY)
    Outcomes and wage sample
    Worker requests
    2
    Certified
    2
    Certified–withdrawn
    0
    Denied
    0
    Withdrawn
    0
    Other / unknown
    0
    Median offered wage
    $117,279
    Compared filings
    2
    Matched offered mean
    $117,279
    Mean BLS median / latest year
    $107,200
    Below BLS
    0
    222$117,279$107,20020180
    Florida (FL)
    Outcomes and wage sample
    Worker requests
    1
    Certified
    1
    Certified–withdrawn
    0
    Denied
    0
    Withdrawn
    0
    Other / unknown
    0
    Median offered wage
    $87,693
    Compared filings
    1
    Matched offered mean
    $87,693
    Mean BLS median / latest year
    $103,620
    Below BLS
    1
    111$87,693$103,62020181
    Georgia (GA)
    Outcomes and wage sample
    Worker requests
    1
    Certified
    0
    Certified–withdrawn
    1
    Denied
    0
    Withdrawn
    0
    Other / unknown
    0
    Median offered wage
    $164,460
    Compared filings
    1
    Matched offered mean
    $164,460
    Mean BLS median / latest year
    $103,620
    Below BLS
    0
    111$164,460$103,62020180
    Illinois (IL)
    Outcomes and wage sample
    Worker requests
    1
    Certified
    1
    Certified–withdrawn
    0
    Denied
    0
    Withdrawn
    0
    Other / unknown
    0
    Median offered wage
    $150,972
    Compared filings
    1
    Matched offered mean
    $150,972
    Mean BLS median / latest year
    $88,740
    Below BLS
    0
    111$150,972$88,74020180

    Compare the same work and year

    Each row groups the same canonical occupation and decision calendar year. Both wage means use the same positive, unflagged offers. Each filing uses its reported SOC and the latest positive national BLS median at or before its filing year. Records without a filing date use the latest loaded national survey. All outcomes and visa classes are included.

    Decision year 2018 · SOC 15-1299 · Sorted by compared filing count. This is a sample comparison, not a ranking of firm quality.

    FirmCompared filingsBelow-BLS share
    MichelleburnsThis firmSmall sample
    Details
    Firm-linked filings
    6
    Matched offered mean
    $136,451
    Mean BLS occupation median
    $90,270
    Latest BLS year in scope
    2018
    Offered vs BLS
    51.2%
    60.0%0 / 6
    FRAGOMEN, del REY & Bernsen & LOEWY, LLP
    Details
    Firm-linked filings
    944
    Matched offered mean
    $102,789
    Mean BLS occupation median
    $90,270
    Latest BLS year in scope
    2018
    Offered vs BLS
    13.9%
    94438.8%366 / 944
    Fakhoury Global IMMIGRATION, USA PC
    Details
    Firm-linked filings
    371
    Matched offered mean
    $91,364
    Mean BLS occupation median
    $90,270
    Latest BLS year in scope
    2018
    Offered vs BLS
    1.2%
    37155.5%206 / 371
    Goel & Anderson, LLC
    Details
    Firm-linked filings
    268
    Matched offered mean
    $77,979
    Mean BLS occupation median
    $90,270
    Latest BLS year in scope
    2018
    Offered vs BLS
    -13.6%
    26878.0%209 / 268
    Law Offices of Rakesh Mehrotra
    Details
    Firm-linked filings
    209
    Matched offered mean
    $94,163
    Mean BLS occupation median
    $90,270
    Latest BLS year in scope
    2018
    Offered vs BLS
    4.3%
    20945.5%95 / 209
    Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP
    Details
    Firm-linked filings
    207
    Matched offered mean
    $127,048
    Mean BLS occupation median
    $90,270
    Latest BLS year in scope
    2018
    Offered vs BLS
    40.7%
    2076.3%13 / 207
    CHUGH, LLP
    Details
    Firm-linked filings
    159
    Matched offered mean
    $94,757
    Mean BLS occupation median
    $90,270
    Latest BLS year in scope
    2018
    Offered vs BLS
    5.0%
    15949.7%79 / 159
    Jethmalani & Nallaseth PLLC
    Details
    Firm-linked filings
    130
    Matched offered mean
    $83,103
    Mean BLS occupation median
    $90,270
    Latest BLS year in scope
    2018
    Offered vs BLS
    -7.9%
    13065.4%85 / 130

    Recent source records (16)

    This is a recent-record window, not the full archive. It includes all LCA outcomes and visa classes. Counts and sorting apply to this window.

    Explore full history · Recent preview

    Title · Worksite

    A negative % sits below the BLS market median; a positive % sits above.

    Questions about the data & methods

    Does Michelleburns file H-1B filings?

    Yes. Michelleburns is named on 16 H-1B labor condition applications across 1 employer, per Department of Labor disclosure records.

    How many employers use Michelleburns for H-1B filings?

    1 employer has filed H-1B filings naming Michelleburns, totaling 16 filings.

    What does Michelleburns do in the H-1B process?

    The disclosure names the firm associated with the attorney or agent on the H-1B labor condition application. This links the firm to the filing. It does not establish who signed the employer declaration or prove misconduct.

    What wage data is on record for Michelleburns's H-1B filings?

    Certified H-1B filings with reported wages have a mean annualized offered wage of $131,768. Flagged records are excluded. In the separate model-certified population, 38% offer below BLS. That population includes filings without reported wages. Offered wages are source values, not a measure of wages paid.

    Which linked employer has the most LCA filings naming Michelleburns?

    IBM Corporation leads the client list with 16 firm-linked LCA filings across all outcomes and visa classes.

    How many names are listed as attorneys or agents for Michelleburns?

    The source-name table contains 1 group linked to Michelleburns. These groups can contain people, organization names, or unresolved names. A listing does not prove a signature or current firm membership.

    What worker-equivalent exposure does the model assign to filings naming Michelleburns?

    The model assigns about 17 worker-equivalent exposures to certified filings that name Michelleburns. This is not a count of documented job losses or a finding against the firm. Each employer's page shows its own breakdown.

    How can I report misconduct involving Michelleburns?

    Current or former employees, clients, and contractors can file a confidential tip on the XH1B whistleblower page. Reports are timestamped and hash-sealed on arrival, and they support investigations into H-1B program abuse.

    Public source records and site analysis. We do not attest to accuracy. Read the full disclaimer.

    Dataset guides and site methods

    1. [1] Dataset documentation · DOL OFLC. LCA public disclosure record layout (FY2026 Q3). Pages 1–4: application, DOL outcome and dates, requested positions, employer, representatives, worksites and pay unitsThis layout covers determinations issued October 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026. It documents employer-provided application fields and DOL decisions, not USCIS decisions, payroll verification, legal bills or worker-linked moves. Older layouts can differ.Checked 2026-10-17.
    2. [2] Dataset documentation · BLS. OEWS technical notes (May 2025). Scope of the survey; occupational coding; concepts and estimation methodologyDocuments occupation and geographic wage estimates, not an individual worker’s pay. Use the estimate year and geography stated by the site; older releases can differ.Checked 2026-10-17.
    3. [3] Dataset documentation · Free Law Project. PACER Data APIs: dockets, parties and attorneys. Overview; Dockets; Parties; AttorneysExplains linked docket, entry, document, party and attorney objects. Missing matches or documents are not evidence that no case or filing exists.Checked 2026-10-18.
    4. [4] XH1B method or registry · XH1B. Calculation and Matching Methods; Reading Public Records and Derived Indicators. Filing units, annualization, weighting, wage comparisons, and inference limits; Reading records: units, source coverage, wage gaps, entity links, and inference limitsThese are the site's review methods, not validated predictions of wrongdoing. Inspect underlying records and alternative explanations.
    5. [5] XH1B method or registry · XH1B. Displacement Model and Assumptions. Eligibility, requested-position weighting, scopes, WARN matching, and counting limitsModel outputs are estimates. A matched layoff notice does not prove that an H-1B worker replaced a laid-off worker.
    6. [6] XH1B method or registry · XH1B. Downstream Research and Methods. Study populations, parameter bounds, baselines, and expected outcomes; linked model card