Law firm records

Nadirismayil

Name listed in source recordsRecord years 2018–2018Source coverageCompare firms
Read the record summary

Nadirismayil appears in 1 H-1B labor condition application for 1 employer. The average annual offered wage is $121,389/year. These are filing wage offers, not payroll observations.

Source import recorded Sep 2, 2026

What the records contain / DOL labor condition applications

What XH1B calculates / Comparisons & modeled estimates

How to read these figures

Certified H-1B headline counts differ from the all-outcome client and recent-record lists. Median wages use records with a reported yearly wage. Mean wages and BLS comparisons use the certified filing summary. Modeled exposure is not an observed count of job losses.

Definitions & methodology

Read the firm record

Certified H-1B filing history

DOL records name Nadirismayil in 1 certified H-1B LCA with reported wages across 1 employer.

Clients and concentration

The client table contains 1 linked employer record across all LCA outcomes and visa classes.

The largest linked employer is Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc., with 1 firm-linked filing.

Latest recorded filing year

Submission year 2018 records 1 filing and 1 worker request. The latest year can be incomplete.

Client industry mix

Manufacturing (NAICS 33) has the most filings: 1, or 100% of 1 records with a usable industry code.

The leading occupation is SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS, SYSTEMS SOFTWARE (SOC 15-1252), with 1 firm-linked filing.

Offered wages and BLS comparisons

Too few yearly wage records are available for a wage distribution.

The stored model population includes 1 certified H-1B filing. The offered wage is below the BLS occupation median in 1 filing. This population also includes filings without reported wages.

The all-outcome employer-linked matched sample compares 1 unflagged filing with national BLS occupation medians as of each filing year. Records without a filing date use the latest loaded national survey. Latest benchmark year in this scope: 2018. Offered wages are below the benchmark in 0 filings. Eligible positive-wage records without a usable benchmark: 0 filings.

Matched names and source coverage

This page describes 1 source spelling found in source records. No approved firm identity is attached to this name.

The recent preview contains 1 recent source record. It is not the full archive.

About these record populations

This headline excludes records flagged for data quality. LCA certification does not establish a USCIS approval, a hire, or a current vacancy.

Annual totals include H-1B filings across outcomes and exclude records flagged for data quality. Coverage can differ by year. The latest year can be incomplete.

Industry totals include all LCA outcomes and visa classes. They describe employer filings, not the location or services of the law firm.

Yearly wage percentiles and annualized client averages can use different records. A BLS comparison is a benchmark, not a legal finding or a measure of wages paid.

Source listings show a filing relationship. They do not establish who signed a filing, current firm membership, or misconduct.

Filing activity

012018: 1 filings; 1 workers requested20182018: 1filings / worker requests
filings / worker requestsWorkers requested

Annual totals include H-1B records with all outcomes. They exclude records with data quality flags. The latest year can be incomplete. Requested workers are not confirmed hires.

Offered-wage distribution

No records are available for this section.

Model & sources

Calculated exposure from firm-linked filings; not observed job losses

Modeled displacement exposure

1

The math
Base (1 per certified worker)
+1
Wage-gap multiplier

1 of 1 filings below BLS median

+0
Total1

. The 1.0 base rate per certified H-1B worker request is a site model assumption. Wage gap multiplier = (BLS median − offered wage) / BLS median, applied only to filings offering less than the BLS median. Related research provides context, not validation of these exact coefficients. This is a modeled estimate, not a count of actual displacements.

Exposure method v1.2 · This is a modeled worker-equivalent count.

DOL filing records

The certified headline counts H-1B filings with reported wages and excludes flagged records. The model population also includes filings without reported wages. Client, listed-name, industry, and recent-record lists include all LCA outcomes and visa classes.

Offered wages & BLS

Percentiles use positive wages reported per year. Matched means use eligible annualized wages across outcomes. Reported client means can include other wage units and large converted values. Inspect the filing status and original unit.

Matched names & listed people

Matched firm spellings combine related source records. A name in a filing does not prove current firm membership. Unresolved person names remain separate from resolved people.

Latest decision in this firm record: 2018-10-04. The header update date describes the wider dataset.

Inspect 1 matched source spellings

These are the approved member spellings or the single unresolved source name. Counts describe different certified populations. Years use the H-1B submission series. A missing value is not zero.

Source spellingCertified with wagesModel populationSubmission yearsCalculated
NADIRISMAYIL112018–20182026-11-04

Matched wage records: 1. Missing usable benchmarks: 0. BLS year: 2018. Calculated: 2026-10-27T08:15:21.894Z.

DOL filings can name an attorney or agent. This page groups those listed names. A listed name does not prove who signed a filing or whether anyone broke a rule. For attorneys →

Recent source records (1)

This is a recent-record window, not the full archive. It includes all LCA outcomes and visa classes. Counts and sorting apply to this window.

Explore full history · Recent preview

Title · Worksite

A negative % sits below the BLS market median; a positive % sits above.

Firm and client court records

A filing or a named party does not establish wrongdoing. Direct firm records require an explicit active identity match to the named court party. A lawyer listed as counsel does not make the firm a party. Client cases stay separate.

Cases naming the matched firm as a party

0 matching records

No matching records in this archive.

    Cases naming matched clients as parties

    These cases name employer records in active same-entity client groups. They are client evidence, not cases against the firm. Court coverage is limited to the archived federal dockets.

    0 matching records

    No matching records in this archive.

      Other firms in matched client records

      These links use active same-entity employer groups and active firm matches. A shared client does not establish coordination, shared ownership, or wrongdoing. Counts describe source filings, not legal bills or unique workers.

      2 matching records

      Wages & industries

      Client wages use matched records. Industry totals include all outcomes. The model uses its separate certified H-1B population.

      Client industries

      • Manufacturing (NAICS 33)1 · 100.0%

      All recorded sectors with a usable industry code. Filings include all LCA outcomes and visa classes.

      Industry sectorFilingsShare
      ManufacturingNAICS 331100.0%

      1 filings with a usable industry code. All recorded sectors are included.

      Offered wages against BLS

      Matched offered mean
      $121,389
      Mean matched BLS median
      $110,000
      Offered vs BLS median
      +10%
      Filings below BLS
      100%

      The headline counts certified H-1B filings with reported wages. Matched client wage means use the same eligible source records. The model uses a separate certified population and does not measure observed job losses.

      Percentiles use positive wages reported per year. Matched means use eligible annualized wages across outcomes. Reported client means can include other wage units and large converted values. Inspect the filing status and original unit.

      Client wage comparisons

      All outcomes and visa classes; flagged records are excluded from wage comparisons. Both means use the same filings with a positive annualized offer and positive national BLS median. Each record uses its reported SOC and the latest survey at or before its filing year. Records without a filing date use the latest loaded national survey. Missing benchmarks do not count as zero gaps.

      Default order: number of individual filings below BLS. Annual shortfall sums positive benchmark minus offered wage once per filing, without multiplying by worker requests. It is not a measure of wages paid.

      Compared filings
      Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.
      Wage sample and filing dates
      First decision
      2018-10-04
      Latest decision
      2018-10-04
      Compared filings
      1 · 0 missing benchmarks
      Annual shortfall
      $0
      Matched offered mean
      $121,389
      Mean BLS occupation median
      $110,000 · 2018
      Employer profile
      110 missing benchmarksSmall sample0$0$121,389Mean BLS median $110,000 · latest year 2018+10%
      Definitions & methodology →

      Full filing history

      Client filing worksite states, not firm offices. Filing counts include all outcomes and visa classes. Worker totals and wage comparisons exclude flagged records. Unknown source states remain visible.

      Occupations in firm-linked filings

      Full-history canonical SOC groups. Counts include every outcome. Worker totals and wage comparisons exclude flagged records. Offered and BLS means use the same positive matched records. Raw SOC values remain on source records.

      OccupationFirm-linked filingsWorker requestsCompared filingsMatched offered meanMean BLS median / latest yearBelow BLS
      SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS, SYSTEMS SOFTWARE (15-1252)Occupation profile
      Outcomes and wage sample
      Worker requests
      1
      Certified
      1
      Certified–withdrawn
      0
      Denied
      0
      Withdrawn
      0
      Other / unknown
      0
      Median offered wage
      $121,389
      Compared filings
      1
      Matched offered mean
      $121,389
      Mean BLS median / latest year
      $110,000
      Below BLS
      0
      111$121,389$110,00020180

      Annual filing outcomes

      Calendar year of the decision date. Counts include all outcomes and visa classes. Worker totals sum reported requests and exclude flagged records. Medians use positive annualized offered wages and exclude flagged records. Missing years are not confirmed zeroes.

      Decision yearFirm-linked filingsWorker requestsCertifiedCertified–withdrawnDeniedWithdrawnOther / unknownMedian offered wage
      2018
      Outcomes and wage sample
      Worker requests
      1
      Certified
      1
      Certified–withdrawn
      0
      Denied
      0
      Withdrawn
      0
      Other / unknown
      0
      Median offered wage
      $121,389
      Compared filings
      1
      Matched offered mean
      $121,389
      Mean BLS median / latest year
      $110,000
      Below BLS
      0
      1110000$121,389

      Client filing worksites

      Client filing worksite states, not firm offices. Filing counts include all outcomes and visa classes. Worker totals and wage comparisons exclude flagged records. Unknown source states remain visible.

      Worksite stateFirm-linked filingsWorker requestsCompared filingsMatched offered meanMean BLS median / latest yearBelow BLS
      North Carolina (NC)
      Outcomes and wage sample
      Worker requests
      1
      Certified
      1
      Certified–withdrawn
      0
      Denied
      0
      Withdrawn
      0
      Other / unknown
      0
      Median offered wage
      $121,389
      Compared filings
      1
      Matched offered mean
      $121,389
      Mean BLS median / latest year
      $110,000
      Below BLS
      0
      111$121,389$110,00020180

      Compare the same work and year

      Each row groups the same canonical occupation and decision calendar year. Both wage means use the same positive, unflagged offers. Each filing uses its reported SOC and the latest positive national BLS median at or before its filing year. Records without a filing date use the latest loaded national survey. All outcomes and visa classes are included.

      Decision year 2018 · SOC 15-1252 · Sorted by compared filing count. This is a sample comparison, not a ranking of firm quality.

      FirmCompared filingsBelow-BLS share
      NadirismayilThis firmSmall sample
      Details
      Firm-linked filings
      1
      Matched offered mean
      $121,389
      Mean BLS occupation median
      $110,000
      Latest BLS year in scope
      2018
      Offered vs BLS
      10.4%
      10.0%0 / 1
      FRAGOMEN, del REY & Bernsen & LOEWY, LLP
      Details
      Firm-linked filings
      4,887
      Matched offered mean
      $124,658
      Mean BLS occupation median
      $104,774
      Latest BLS year in scope
      2018
      Offered vs BLS
      19.0%
      4,88724.2%1,182 / 4,887
      Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP
      Details
      Firm-linked filings
      2,168
      Matched offered mean
      $136,525
      Mean BLS occupation median
      $104,450
      Latest BLS year in scope
      2018
      Offered vs BLS
      30.7%
      2,1689.4%203 / 2,168
      Garson LLP
      Details
      Firm-linked filings
      1,172
      Matched offered mean
      $93,066
      Mean BLS occupation median
      $104,600
      Latest BLS year in scope
      2018
      Offered vs BLS
      -11.0%
      1,17272.7%852 / 1,172
      Erickson Immigration Group
      Details
      Firm-linked filings
      841
      Matched offered mean
      $137,946
      Mean BLS occupation median
      $105,236
      Latest BLS year in scope
      2018
      Offered vs BLS
      31.1%
      84113.1%110 / 841
      OGLETREE,DEAKINS,NASH, SMOAK, & STEWART,P.C.
      Details
      Firm-linked filings
      559
      Matched offered mean
      $120,918
      Mean BLS occupation median
      $105,104
      Latest BLS year in scope
      2018
      Offered vs BLS
      15.0%
      55929.7%166 / 559
      Law Office of Thomas V. Allen
      Details
      Firm-linked filings
      549
      Matched offered mean
      $92,281
      Mean BLS occupation median
      $104,433
      Latest BLS year in scope
      2018
      Offered vs BLS
      -11.6%
      54988.9%488 / 549
      CHUGH, LLP
      Details
      Firm-linked filings
      436
      Matched offered mean
      $106,171
      Mean BLS occupation median
      $104,074
      Latest BLS year in scope
      2018
      Offered vs BLS
      2.0%
      43650.2%219 / 436
      Questions about the data & methods

      Does Nadirismayil file H-1B filings?

      Yes. Nadirismayil is named on 1 H-1B labor condition application across 1 employer, per Department of Labor disclosure records.

      How many employers use Nadirismayil for H-1B filings?

      1 employer has filed H-1B filings naming Nadirismayil, totaling 1 filing.

      What does Nadirismayil do in the H-1B process?

      The disclosure names the firm associated with the attorney or agent on the H-1B labor condition application. This links the firm to the filing. It does not establish who signed the employer declaration or prove misconduct.

      What wage data is on record for Nadirismayil's H-1B filings?

      Certified H-1B filings with reported wages have a mean annualized offered wage of $121,389. Flagged records are excluded. In the separate model-certified population, 100% offer below BLS. That population includes filings without reported wages. Offered wages are source values, not a measure of wages paid.

      Which linked employer has the most LCA filings naming Nadirismayil?

      Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. leads the client list with 1 firm-linked LCA filing across all outcomes and visa classes.

      How many names are listed as attorneys or agents for Nadirismayil?

      The source-name table contains 1 group linked to Nadirismayil. These groups can contain people, organization names, or unresolved names. A listing does not prove a signature or current firm membership.

      What worker-equivalent exposure does the model assign to filings naming Nadirismayil?

      The model assigns about 1 worker-equivalent exposures to certified filings that name Nadirismayil. This is not a count of documented job losses or a finding against the firm. Each employer's page shows its own breakdown.

      How can I report misconduct involving Nadirismayil?

      Current or former employees, clients, and contractors can file a confidential tip on the XH1B whistleblower page. Reports are timestamped and hash-sealed on arrival, and they support investigations into H-1B program abuse.

      Public source records and site analysis. We do not attest to accuracy. Read the full disclaimer.

      Dataset guides and site methods

      1. [1] Dataset documentation · DOL OFLC. LCA public disclosure record layout (FY2026 Q3). Pages 1–4: application, DOL outcome and dates, requested positions, employer, representatives, worksites and pay unitsThis layout covers determinations issued October 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026. It documents employer-provided application fields and DOL decisions, not USCIS decisions, payroll verification, legal bills or worker-linked moves. Older layouts can differ.Checked 2026-10-17.
      2. [2] Dataset documentation · BLS. OEWS technical notes (May 2025). Scope of the survey; occupational coding; concepts and estimation methodologyDocuments occupation and geographic wage estimates, not an individual worker’s pay. Use the estimate year and geography stated by the site; older releases can differ.Checked 2026-10-17.
      3. [3] Dataset documentation · Free Law Project. PACER Data APIs: dockets, parties and attorneys. Overview; Dockets; Parties; AttorneysExplains linked docket, entry, document, party and attorney objects. Missing matches or documents are not evidence that no case or filing exists.Checked 2026-10-18.
      4. [4] XH1B method or registry · XH1B. Calculation and Matching Methods; Reading Public Records and Derived Indicators. Filing units, annualization, weighting, wage comparisons, and inference limits; Reading records: units, source coverage, wage gaps, entity links, and inference limitsThese are the site's review methods, not validated predictions of wrongdoing. Inspect underlying records and alternative explanations.
      5. [5] XH1B method or registry · XH1B. Displacement Model and Assumptions. Eligibility, requested-position weighting, scopes, WARN matching, and counting limitsModel outputs are estimates. A matched layoff notice does not prove that an H-1B worker replaced a laid-off worker.
      6. [6] XH1B method or registry · XH1B. Downstream Research and Methods. Study populations, parameter bounds, baselines, and expected outcomes; linked model card
      Nadirismayil: H-1B Law Firm Records