Employer intelligence

Amazon.com Services LLC

Based in Seattle, WA 98121County 53033

BLS comparison: 94,136 certified H-1B wage filings and 443,010 requested workers have a benchmark; 0 eligible filings lack one. Both compared means use the same records and worker weights.

Read the record summaryEditorial analysis · based on linked public records
Amazon.com Services LLC logged 94,136 certified H-1B labor condition applications between 2017 and 2026, requesting 443,010 workers. The displacement model flags 31,477 (33%) below the BLS median wage for the occupation (latest national BLS; mapped SOC). The separate filing-year BLS wage gap is estimated at $3.58B. Using the platform's displacement model (base rate plus the wage-gap multiplier), Amazon.com Services LLC's filings yield 495.3K worker-equivalent exposures (model output, not a verified layoff count). DOL lists it as a willful violator of H-1B rules. The company is designated an H-1B dependent employer.
Understand this employer record

Certified H-1B filing history

The employer record contains 94,136 certified H-1B LCAs. DOL certification confirms an LCA decision; it does not establish a USCIS approval, a hire, or a current vacancy.

Latest recorded H-1B filing year

In calendar year 2026, the annual series records 2,415 filings and 20,850 worker requests. It groups H-1B LCAs by submission year across filing outcomes. Worker requests are not unique workers or confirmed hires.

That year includes 2,415 certified LCAs, 0 denied LCAs, and 0 withdrawn LCAs. Certified includes certified-withdrawn records.

The median annual offered wage for that year is $152,100/year. This is a filing wage offer, not a payroll observation.

The annual series excludes records flagged for data quality. Years can have different coverage, and the latest year can be incomplete. Check the annual table before comparing growth or outcomes.

Offered wages and occupation benchmarks

Among the 50 occupation comparisons displayed here, Software Developers has the most filings (20,010). Its average annual offered wage is $136,307/year, compared with a BLS national occupation median of $132,727/year.

This is a bounded sample of occupation averages from LCA records across statuses and visa classes. It excludes records flagged for data quality. A BLS comparison is a benchmark, not a legal finding. Occupation averages do not describe every filing or establish wages paid.

Linked public records

No WARN notice is linked in the available records. Coverage is limited to the sources collected; this does not establish that no layoffs occurred.

Available linked records include 11 federal contract records. Contract records describe award actions and obligations, not necessarily payments received.

Available linked records include 34 court dockets. Inspect the docket for parties, claims, orders, and outcomes. A linked case is not a finding of liability.

Modeled exposure and official findings

The displacement model reports 495,279.618 worker-equivalent exposures for this employer record. This is a model output, not an observed count of displaced people or a verified layoff count.

Wage and Hour Division records link 1 case to this employer. These agency records are separate from the wage benchmarks and model estimates.

The employer record carries a DOL willful-violator designation. Inspect the designation and source dates for its scope.

The employer record carries an H-1B-dependent designation. This is a program classification, not a finding of fraud.

Source import recorded Sep 2, 2026

First filing 2017-09-27Latest filing 2026-03-25NAICS 45999Definitions & methodology ↗

What the records contain / DOL & WARN disclosures

What XH1B calculates / Comparisons & modeled estimates

How to read these figures

The below-BLS flags come from the stored displacement model. Its denominator includes all clean certified H-1B filings. It uses the latest national BLS year and mapped occupation codes. The current wage summary uses eligible positive wage offers and filing-year BLS matches. These counts have different scopes. Displacement is a model result, not an observed count of job losses.

Definitions & methodology ↗

Findings & context

Key findings

How to read ↗

Connections that warrant a closer look.

Context & calculation notes
  • 33% flagged below BLS in displacement model

    The stored displacement model flags 31,477 of 94,136 clean certified H-1B filings with positive offers below the latest national BLS occupational median. It maps occupation codes before comparison. The denominator includes filings without a usable wage or benchmark. The current wage summary uses eligible positive offers and filing-year BLS matches. These counts differ. A model flag is not a wage-law finding.

  • DOL enforcement history

    1 H-1B Wage & Hour Division case. Open the case details and assessed amounts.

  • Federal contracting alongside visa filings

    $268,649 in recorded federal awards. Review agencies, award dates, and the original records.

  • Related litigation

    34 linked cases. Case allegations and outcomes must be assessed separately.

Connections alone do not establish causation or misconduct.

Filings & worker requests

↗
RecordDOL · submission year
020K40K60K80K100K2017: 2 filings2018: 5,831 filings2019: 7,834 filings2020: 11,154 filings2021: 10,436 filings2022: 15,315 filings2023: 13,210 filings2024: 14,109 filings2025: 14,628 filings2026: 2,415 filings2017201920212023202520262017: 2 workers requested2018: 17,605 workers requested2019: 9,358 workers requested2020: 26,003 workers requested2021: 106,557 workers requested2022: 67,746 workers requested2023: 83,976 workers requested2024: 61,544 workers requested2025: 53,003 workers requested2026: 20,850 workers requestedfilings / workers
filings / workersWorkers requested

All statuses; quality-flagged rows excluded. Latest year can be incomplete.

Outcomes, wages & source events

Wages against the benchmark

↗
DOL BLSOccupation averages
7 / 50displayed occupation averages
below BLS
Offered wage BLS medianGap

Selected comparisons from 50 occupation averages. An above-benchmark average can include individual below-benchmark filings.

All wages, counts & methodology

Worksite distribution

Location DOL BLS402 mapped counties

County color shows filing volume. Hover for county-level wage comparisons; click to inspect its records.

Loading map…
Fewer filings10,000+ filings

Volume uses a logarithmic scale. Counties without a BLS benchmark have no wage comparison.

Inspect all worksite records →
Follow the evidence

Original records behind the employer profile · Swipe for more record types →

Source catalog ↗
WARN Employer0 records

No linked records in the loaded evidence. Coverage can be incomplete.

Inspect evidence & coverage
Awards Employer11 records
Action dateAgencyObligated
U.S. Agency for Global Media$17,592
U.S. International Development Finance Corporation$150,000
Library of Congress$500
Environmental Protection Agency$22,038
U.S. Agency for Global Media$21,897
Environmental Protection Agency$8,854
Department of Education$25,200
General Services Administration$0
First 8 loaded records · inspect full table
Court Employer34 records
FiledCaseDocket
Cesario v. Amazon.com Services LLC1:26-cv-09338
Stocker v. Amazon.com Services LLC3:26-cv-00069
Newsom v. Amazon.com Services LLC1:26-cv-08878
Ellison v. Amazon.com Services LLC3:26-cv-07782
Valencia v. Amazon.com Services LLC2:26-cv-05113
Vidales v. Amazon.com Services LLC1:26-cv-05522
Morales v. Amazon.com Services LLC1:26-cv-05484
Macario v. Amazon.com Services, LLC2:26-cv-04174
First 8 loaded records · inspect full table
SEC Person0 records

No linked records in the loaded evidence. Coverage can be incomplete.

Inspect evidence & coverage

Wages & occupations

Compare wage offers with occupational benchmarks. Inspect the counts and assumptions behind each gap.

Wage gap by occupation

How Amazon.com Services LLC’s offered H-1B wage compares to the BLS market median for the year each filing was made. A role’s gap covers its filings that have a benchmark for their filing year; the rest are excluded. Negative gaps are below the benchmark.

Top 50 of 132 recorded occupations. An occupation without a market benchmark has no gap to show.

Offered wages and BLS medians by occupation at Amazon.com Services LLC
OccupationFilingsOffered avg.BLS medianGap
Software Developers15-125220,010$136,307$132,727+3%
Software Developers, Applications15-113218,136$112,452$103,620+9%
Computer and Information Systems Managers11-30217,154$174,417$166,483+5%
Operations Research Analysts15-20315,959$100,885$85,243+18%
Business Intelligence Analysts15-20515,301$120,922$113,039+7%
Computer Occupations, All Other15-11993,694$86,301$90,270-4%
Transportation, Storage, and Distribution Managers11-30713,129$116,776$100,341+16%
Statisticians15-20412,796$112,548$97,834+15%
Compare on a chart / export data
-58%-29%0+29%+58%Software Developers+3%SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS, APP…+9%Computer and Information…+5%Operations Research Anal…+18%Business Intelligence An…+7%COMPUTER OCCUPATIONS, AL…-4%Transportation, Storage,…+16%Statisticians+15%Computer Systems Enginee…+24%SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS, SYS…+6%Computer and Information…+10%Logisticians+1%Computer and Information…+4%ACCOUNTANTS AND AUDITORS+18%Software Quality Assuran…+13%Marketing Managers+2%Market Research Analysts…+34%INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERS+14%Computer Hardware Engine…+1%Graphic Designers+58%Database Administrators+7%Data Warehousing Special…-4%Information Security Ana…+7%Economists-3%Project Management Speci…+14%Supply Chain Managers-14%Financial Managers0%Human Resources Speciali…+16%Information Security Ana…+9%NETWORK AND COMPUTER SYS…+3%Database Administrators+1%Computer Network Archite…+5%FINANCIAL ANALYSTS+8%Computer Systems Analysts+23%Computer Network Archite…+4%Financial Quantitative A…+3%Purchasing Managers0%Computer Systems Analysts+9%Lawyers-7%MECHANICAL ENGINEERS+40%Network and Computer Sys…+10%ENGINEERS, ALL OTHER-5%Electrical Engineers+21%General and Operations M…+43%MANAGEMENT ANALYSTS+12%Financial Risk Specialists-14%BUSINESS OPERATIONS SPEC…+1%Civil Engineers+31%Purchasing Agents, Excep…+12%HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGERS+14%% vs BLS median

Wages against industry peers

Median H-1B wage for Amazon.com Services LLC against the NAICS 459 cohort (213 employers in the same industry).

Employer median$142,800Annual offered wage
Industry median$143,000NAICS 459 · 213 employers
Compare on a chart / export data

Modeled displacement estimate

495,280

The math
Base (1 per certified worker)
+443,010
Wage-gap multiplier

31477 of 94136 filings below BLS median

+52,270
Total495,280

Σ workers×(1+wage_gap) + Σ WARN layoffs. The 1.0 base rate per certified H-1B worker request is a site model assumption. Wage gap multiplier = (BLS median − offered wage) / BLS median, applied only to filings offering less than the BLS median. Related research provides context, not validation of these exact coefficients. This is a modeled estimate, not a count of actual displacements.

Exposure method v1.2 · This is a modeled worker-equivalent count.

Modeled consequence estimates

Conditional impacts associated with modeled displacement

Explore Amazon.com Services LLC’s scenarioEarnings · children · health · adjust the worker count

These are conditional population estimates scaled from Amazon.com Services LLC's current modeled displacement count. They are not observed outcomes, a prediction about any person, or evidence that this entity caused displacement.

Exposure method v1.2 (stored with this aggregate) · benchmarked to the latest BLS survey. Consequence parameters v1.54; build v1.54+engine0.4.1+d84162591c94d06c8148c4834ae705ff3f9a015c29955d95d26749834cd136ed+national-reference1

Excess deaths over 20 years

Illustrative reference calculation · population applicability is not established

14,243.61

Range: 5,577.98 to 24,811.33

20-year reference scenario: high-seniority male displacement effect. This is not an expected count for an unknown population.

Source-profile mortality point (deaths)
14,243.612265
No sustained excess from year 7 (deaths)
10,164.7977469

Declared structural comparison; not a confidence interval or a model probability.

Baseline population: US prime-age men (45-54).

Child lifetime earnings lost

Illustrative reference calculation · population applicability is not established

$237.2B

Range: $61.6B to $400.4B

Canadian father–son firm-closure effect, applied to a US male lifetime-earnings baseline in 2024 dollars. The reference result uses 2 children per worker.

Baseline population: US male median lifetime earnings.

The mortality effect comes from a high-seniority male study cohort. Treat the count as a reference scenario unless the population matches. A mixed population needs a reviewed transport rule.

The range is the engine's parameter-support envelope: it varies declared parameters only and adds none of the exposure input's uncertainty.

The math, limits, and citations

Illustrative reference calculation scaled by the supplied worker-equivalent exposure. Two children per worker; 20-year mortality follow-up. This does not establish that an entity caused these outcomes.

Input SHA-256: a771d456f24b73ab4a27e51e83ec07640a0d93114d4ffc968aae925e700d843d

Excess deaths over 20 years: {"status":"illustrative_reference_calculation","eligible_for_public_headline":false,"target_population":null,"decision":null,"transport_assumptions":["high-tenure male mass-layoff cohort, ages 45–54","Pennsylvania early-1980s response transported to target place and calendar time","fixed baseline age rate over follow-up; cohort aging is not modeled"],"reason":"Target cohort applicability and transport have not been established for this outcome; display as an illustrative reference calculation."}

Child lifetime earnings lost: {"status":"illustrative_reference_calculation","eligible_for_public_headline":false,"target_population":null,"decision":null,"transport_assumptions":["Canadian father-son firm-closure estimate transported to the target families","US male synthetic career earnings convert a relative adult earnings effect to dollars","lifetime dollars are undiscounted; this is not an annual loss"],"reason":"Target cohort applicability and transport have not been established for this outcome; display as an illustrative reference calculation."}

Projection eligibility: {"child":{"status":"direct_estimate","eligible_for_validated_direct_contrast":true,"reason":"direct displacement-to-child adult earnings estimate; transport still requires an applicability decision"},"grandchild":{"status":"structural_projection","eligible_for_validated_direct_contrast":false,"reason":"combines a direct child estimate with an intergenerational persistence assumption; not an identified displacement intervention effect"},"greatgrandchild":{"status":"source_withdrawn","eligible_for_validated_direct_contrast":false,"reason":"source withdrawn for grandchild_earnings->greatgrandchild_earnings: The source measures earnings for three generations and education for four. It does not estimate .55 causal gap transmission to a fourth earnings generation. Retaining a projection would require an explicit uncalibrated assumption, not a source-identified default."}}

Exposure source: {"source":"one-worker normalized reference input","method":"scale by the stored warehouse worker-equivalent exposure at read time"}

Exact values: excess deaths over 20 years 14,243.612265 (range 5,577.98054392 to 24,811.332094); child lifetime earnings lost $237,186,460,363.47 (range $61,606,872,821.68 to $400,444,673,340.92);

The displayed range is a parameter-support envelope, not a confidence interval.

Place reference: national reference.

Not included: exposure estimation error; baseline estimation error; unmodeled pathways.

Blocked model paths: local_service_jobs_lost: requires a documented net local loss of tradable jobs; worker displacement alone is not this exposure.

  • Excess deaths over 20 years: sullivan2009 (earnings_shock->mortality_peak; canonical) Study population: US high-seniority displaced men born 1930-1959.
  • Excess deaths over 20 years: sullivan2009 (earnings_shock->mortality_offset_1; canonical) Study population: US high-seniority displaced men born 1930-1959.
  • Excess deaths over 20 years: sullivan2009 (earnings_shock->mortality_offsets_2_3; canonical) Study population: US high-seniority displaced men born 1930-1959.
  • Excess deaths over 20 years: sullivan2009 (earnings_shock->mortality_offsets_4_5; canonical) Study population: US high-seniority displaced men born 1930-1959.
  • Excess deaths over 20 years: sullivan2009 (earnings_shock->mortality_sustained; canonical) Study population: US high-seniority displaced men born 1930-1959.
  • Child lifetime earnings lost: oreopoulos2008 (displacement->child_earnings; EXACT) Study population: Canada 39k father-son pairs firm closures.
Scenario assumptions, sensitivity and source records

Outcome statistics use the displayed exposure. Baselines, coefficients, annual family schedules and component records retain their source normalization.

{
  "displayed_workers": 495279.618,
  "source_normalization_workers": 1,
  "applicability": {
    "excess_deaths": {
      "status": "illustrative_reference_calculation",
      "eligible_for_public_headline": false,
      "target_population": null,
      "decision": null,
      "transport_assumptions": [
        "high-tenure male mass-layoff cohort, ages 45–54",
        "Pennsylvania early-1980s response transported to target place and calendar time",
        "fixed baseline age rate over follow-up; cohort aging is not modeled"
      ],
      "reason": "Target cohort applicability and transport have not been established for this outcome; display as an illustrative reference calculation."
    },
    "child_lifetime_earnings_lost_usd": {
      "status": "illustrative_reference_calculation",
      "eligible_for_public_headline": false,
      "target_population": null,
      "decision": null,
      "transport_assumptions": [
        "Canadian father-son firm-closure estimate transported to the target families",
        "US male synthetic career earnings convert a relative adult earnings effect to dollars",
        "lifetime dollars are undiscounted; this is not an annual loss"
      ],
      "reason": "Target cohort applicability and transport have not been established for this outcome; display as an illustrative reference calculation."
    }
  },
  "target_population": null,
  "projection_eligibility": {
    "child": {
      "status": "direct_estimate",
      "eligible_for_validated_direct_contrast": true,
      "reason": "direct displacement-to-child adult earnings estimate; transport still requires an applicability decision"
    },
    "grandchild": {
      "status": "structural_projection",
      "eligible_for_validated_direct_contrast": false,
      "reason": "combines a direct child estimate with an intergenerational persistence assumption; not an identified displacement intervention effect"
    },
    "greatgrandchild": {
      "status": "source_withdrawn",
      "eligible_for_validated_direct_contrast": false,
      "reason": "source withdrawn for grandchild_earnings->greatgrandchild_earnings: The source measures earnings for three generations and education for four. It does not estimate .55 causal gap transmission to a fourth earnings generation. Retaining a projection would require an explicit uncalibrated assumption, not a source-identified default."
    }
  },
  "child_applicability": {
    "source": "oreopoulos2008",
    "source_age_at_displacement": [
      10,
      14
    ],
    "source_child_sex": "Male",
    "source_parent_sex": "Male",
    "source_geography": "Canada",
    "source_event": "father firm closure 1980-1982",
    "target_child_profiles": null,
    "incompatible_children": [],
    "unknown_children": [],
    "source_income_quartile": null,
    "income_rank_definition": null,
    "eligible_for_reviewed_transport": false,
    "status": "unknown",
    "limitations": [
      "No response curve across child ages is identified by this narrow cohort.",
      "Income groups refer to father's average pre-displacement income in 1978-1979; target rank mapping requires a transport argument.",
      "A subgroup's nonsignificant coefficient is retained with its uncertainty, not replaced with zero."
    ]
  },
  "child_valuation": null,
  "assumptions": {
    "mortality_method": "odds_survival",
    "mortality_timing": "Source-offset profile: displacement, +1, +2–3, +4–5, and +6+; displacement is follow-up year 1, so offset +6 begins in follow-up year 7. Annual baseline rates use a constant-hazard rate-to-risk conversion; odds ratios modify annual risk, and survival compounds across phases. The selected baseline age rate is held fixed over the follow-up horizon.",
    "mortality_contract": {
      "method": "odds_survival",
      "timing": "source_profile",
      "baseline_conversion": "1-exp(-annual_rate)",
      "phases": [
        {
          "phase": "displacement",
          "start_offset": 0,
          "duration_years": 1,
          "first_follow_up_year": 1
        },
        {
          "phase": "offset_1",
          "start_offset": 1,
          "duration_years": 1,
          "first_follow_up_year": 2
        },
        {
          "phase": "offsets_2_3",
          "start_offset": 2,
          "duration_years": 2,
          "first_follow_up_year": 3
        },
        {
          "phase": "offsets_4_5",
          "start_offset": 4,
          "duration_years": 2,
          "first_follow_up_year": 5
        },
        {
          "phase": "offset_6_plus",
          "start_offset": 6,
          "duration_years": null,
          "first_follow_up_year": 7
        }
      ],
      "description": "Source-offset profile: displacement, +1, +2–3, +4–5, and +6+; displacement is follow-up year 1, so offset +6 begins in follow-up year 7. Annual baseline rates use a constant-hazard rate-to-risk conversion; odds ratios modify annual risk, and survival compounds across phases. The selected baseline age rate is held fixed over the follow-up horizon."
    },
    "place_application": "initial_only",
    "place_counterfactual": "national child-dollar result is the reference"
  },
  "exposure_provenance": {
    "source": "one-worker normalized reference input",
    "method": "scale by the stored warehouse worker-equivalent exposure at read time"
  },
  "place": null,
  "place_mix": [],
  "input_content_sha256": "a771d456f24b73ab4a27e51e83ec07640a0d93114d4ffc968aae925e700d843d",
  "engine_version": "0.4.1",
  "bundle_sha256": "d84162591c94d06c8148c4834ae705ff3f9a015c29955d95d26749834cd136ed",
  "exposure_input_sha256": "8b4c78f6529f0fbefd8fc3154c9e9b976065d910b4c6e9d55690e36d5c3cdeaa",
  "input_hash": null,
  "engine_sha256": "d84162591c94d06c8148c4834ae705ff3f9a015c29955d95d26749834cd136ed",
  "adapter_sha256": "5fe4b51a9cebfb247cfcd74c734a2b6cb0eae44fce1073917b01455525c6ae52",
  "outcomes": {
    "excess_deaths": {
      "point": 14243.6122650126,
      "low": 5577.980543921612,
      "high": 24811.33209395668,
      "unit": "deaths",
      "baseline": {
        "value": 0.004944,
        "annual_probability": 0.004931798548274205,
        "unit": "deaths_per_person_year",
        "citation": "cdc_wonder D76 (Underlying Cause of Death, 1999-2020), Male 45-54 years, pooled 2015-2019: 514314 deaths / 104024440 person-years = 494.4 per 100k; pulled 2026-09-06 via scraper.cli wonder-mortality into warehouse wonder_mortality",
        "population": "US prime-age men (45-54)",
        "notes": "Pre-pandemic window: excludes 2020 (COVID-distorted; 2020 crude rate 601.5/100k). Single-year 2019 = 490.0/100k. Ages 45-54 match the Sullivan & von Wachter prime-age counterfactual population",
        "sex": "Male",
        "age": "45-54 years",
        "years": "2015-2019",
        "cause": "All causes",
        "geography": "US"
      },
      "steps": [
        {
          "link": "earnings_shock->mortality_peak",
          "phase": "displacement",
          "point": 2.6698,
          "low": 2.1144,
          "high": 3.3711,
          "citation": "sullivan2009",
          "tier": "canonical",
          "population_scope": "US high-seniority displaced men born 1930-1959",
          "evidence_role": "conditional"
        },
        {
          "link": "earnings_shock->mortality_offset_1",
          "phase": "offset_1",
          "point": 1.9838,
          "low": 1.3697,
          "high": 2.8732,
          "citation": "sullivan2009",
          "tier": "canonical",
          "population_scope": "US high-seniority displaced men born 1930-1959",
          "evidence_role": "conditional"
        },
        {
          "link": "earnings_shock->mortality_offsets_2_3",
          "phase": "offsets_2_3",
          "point": 1.7315,
          "low": 1.3238,
          "high": 2.2649,
          "citation": "sullivan2009",
          "tier": "canonical",
          "population_scope": "US high-seniority displaced men born 1930-1959",
          "evidence_role": "conditional"
        },
        {
          "link": "earnings_shock->mortality_offsets_4_5",
          "phase": "offsets_4_5",
          "point": 1.2712,
          "low": 0.97,
          "high": 1.6661,
          "citation": "sullivan2009",
          "tier": "canonical",
          "population_scope": "US high-seniority displaced men born 1930-1959",
          "evidence_role": "conditional"
        },
        {
          "link": "earnings_shock->mortality_sustained",
          "phase": "offset_6_plus",
          "point": 1.1354,
          "low": 1.0335,
          "high": 1.2474,
          "citation": "sullivan2009",
          "tier": "canonical",
          "population_scope": "US high-seniority displaced men born 1930-1959",
          "evidence_role": "conditional"
        }
      ],
      "components": {
        "follow_up_years": 20,
        "method": "odds_survival",
        "timing": "source_profile"
      },
      "applicability": {
        "status": "illustrative_reference_calculation",
        "eligible_for_public_headline": false,
        "target_population": null,
        "decision": null,
        "transport_assumptions": [
          "high-tenure male mass-layoff cohort, ages 45–54",
          "Pennsylvania early-1980s response transported to target place and calendar time",
          "fixed baseline age rate over follow-up; cohort aging is not modeled"
        ],
        "reason": "Target cohort applicability and transport have not been established for this outcome; display as an illustrative reference calculation."
      },
      "interpretation": "Conditional modeled expected difference; parameter bands are support envelopes, not a confidence interval.",
      "persistence_sensitivity": {
        "available": true,
        "status": "declared_structural_sensitivity",
        "eligible_for_public_headline": false,
        "unit": "deaths",
        "variants": {
          "source_profile": {
            "point": 14243.6122650126,
            "low": 5577.980543921612,
            "high": 24811.33209395668,
            "evidence_status": "source_profile_with_transport_assumptions",
            "citations": [
              "sullivan2009"
            ]
          },
          "no_sustained_excess": {
            "point": 10164.797746897551,
            "low": 4552.0482881510125,
            "high": 17513.71912163077,
            "evidence_status": "structural_assumption",
            "motivating_citations": [
              "eliasonstorrie2009"
            ],
            "assumption": "Retain source odds through offset +5; set offset +6 onward OR=1.",
            "first_changed_follow_up_year": 7,
            "fixed_late_odds_ratio": 1
          }
        },
        "source_minus_no_sustained_point": 4078.814518115048,
        "structural_point_range": {
          "low": 10164.797746897551,
          "high": 14243.6122650126,
          "interpretation": "Range of point estimates across these two assumptions; not a confidence interval or a bound on the true effect."
        },
        "shared_inputs": [
          "exposure",
          "resolved mortality baseline",
          "follow-up horizon",
          "source odds through offset +5"
        ],
        "limitations": [
          "No probabilities or model-average weights are assigned to the structures.",
          "A nonsignificant long-run estimate does not establish an exactly zero effect.",
          "The Swedish study differs in population, design, effect scale and follow-up; this hybrid does not reproduce its estimates or substitute its hazard ratios for odds ratios.",
          "The cutoff follows the source profile's offset +6 phase, not the Swedish study's windows; persistence beyond its 12-year follow-up is an assumption in either direction.",
          "Baseline aging and target-population transport remain unresolved in both structures."
        ]
      }
    },
    "child_lifetime_earnings_lost_usd": {
      "point": 237186460363.46637,
      "low": 61606872821.67961,
      "high": 400444673340.9171,
      "steps": [
        {
          "link": "displacement->child_earnings",
          "kind": "direct",
          "citation": "oreopoulos2008",
          "tier": "EXACT",
          "param_point": 0.9076,
          "param_low": 0.844,
          "param_high": 0.976,
          "value_point": 0.9076,
          "value_low": 0.844,
          "value_high": 0.976,
          "causal_role": "direct_displacement_estimate",
          "population_scope": "Canada 39k father-son pairs firm closures",
          "evidence_role": "conditional"
        }
      ],
      "unit": "usd_2024",
      "baseline": {
        "value": 2591418,
        "unit": "usd_2024",
        "citation": "SSA Annual Statistical Supplement 2025, Table 4.B6 (CWHS/Master Earnings File, 1 percent sample): male median earnings by age, 2023 (preliminary) — synthetic career ages 20-64 = 5x(24218+42561+52485+60423+64962+67506+68160+64854)+2x60666+3x56666 = 2517175 usd_2023; CPI-U annual averages 304.702->313.689 (BLS series CUUR0000SA0, pulled 2026-09-06) -> 2591418 usd_2024; warehouse ssa_median_earnings (pulled via ssa-earnings-download)",
        "population": "US male median lifetime earnings",
        "notes": "Derivation declared: the cross-sectional age profile summed over a 45-year working life (ages 20-64) is a synthetic cohort — the sum of age-band medians approximates rather than equals the median of individual lifetime sums; median-of-workers semantics excludes non-working years; 2023 medians are preliminary (SSA replaces them with final data in a later edition)"
      },
      "applicability": {
        "status": "illustrative_reference_calculation",
        "eligible_for_public_headline": false,
        "target_population": null,
        "decision": null,
        "transport_assumptions": [
          "Canadian father-son firm-closure estimate transported to the target families",
          "US male synthetic career earnings convert a relative adult earnings effect to dollars",
          "lifetime dollars are undiscounted; this is not an annual loss"
        ],
        "reason": "Target cohort applicability and transport have not been established for this outcome; display as an illustrative reference calculation."
      },
      "interpretation": "Conditional modeled expected difference; parameter bands are support envelopes, not a confidence interval."
    }
  }
}

Parameter set v1.54 · model v1.54+engine0.4.1+d84162591c94d06c8148c4834ae705ff3f9a015c29955d95d26749834cd136ed+national-reference1

Connections to investigate

Follow public money, visa requests and labor records. Separate documented findings from signals for review.
DOCUMENTED FINDING · DOL WHISARD

DOL Wage & Hour Division findings

DOL Wage & Hour Division records list 1 H-1B case. These are adjudicated findings, not modeled estimates.

1

H-1B cases

$0

back wages assessed

0

workers affected

$0

civil penalties

Cases (DOL WHD WHISARD)

  • Case #1489312Jun 16, 2006 – Nov 16, 20071 H-1B violation · 0 workers · $0 back wages · $0 penalties

Amounts are as recorded in the WHISARD case record: $0 means the closed case reports no assessed amount, not missing data. Source: DOL enforcement data portal. DOL publishes no per-case deep link; search the portal by case number or employer name.

Registry and filing review: 2/7 checks flagged

Each badge represents one flagged check in the stored review snapshot. Checks cover registry status, officer records, filing volume, H-1B dependency and DOL willful-violator status. Missing records can reflect coverage gaps. This count does not establish a shell company.

Filing activity & decisions

Read individual applications beside the filing timeline. Explore how requests, wages and occupations change.

LCA filings (97,462)

Outcome percentages use quality-filtered H-1B filings with a submission date. The table includes all LCA outcomes and visa classes.

Certified

99%

Median offered wage

$142.8K

Top occupation

15-1252

Software Developers

Latest year

2026

Title · Worksite

A negative % sits below the BLS market median; a positive % sits above.

Filing activity & wages

RecordDOL filings2017–2026 · submission year
020K40K60K80K100K2017: 2 filings (2 workers)2018: 5,831 filings (17,605 workers)2019: 7,834 filings (9,358 workers)2020: 11,154 filings (26,003 workers)2021: 10,436 filings (106,557 workers)2022: 15,315 filings (67,746 workers)2023: 13,210 filings (83,976 workers)2024: 14,109 filings (61,544 workers)2025: 14,628 filings (53,003 workers)2026: 2,415 filings (20,850 workers)15,315 filings · 20222017201920212023202520262017: 2 workers requested2018: 17,605 workers requested2019: 9,358 workers requested2020: 26,003 workers requested2021: 106,557 workers requested2022: 67,746 workers requested2023: 83,976 workers requested2024: 61,544 workers requested2025: 53,003 workers requested2026: 20,850 workers requestedfilings / workers
12 source events & annotations
  1. 2001.COM recession: dot-com bust filings collapse
  2. 2004H-1B cap sunsets back to 65,000 (AC21 expiry) · Source ↗
  3. 2009Great recession: Employ American Workers Act (TARP recipients restricted) · Source ↗
  4. 2013Infosys pays record $34M visa-fraud settlement (ICE/DOJ) · Source ↗
  5. 2015$4,000 H-1B "9/11 fee" on 50+ / >50% H-1B employers · Source ↗
  6. 2017Buy American, Hire American EO · Source ↗
  7. 2017USCIS suspends premium processing; site visits expand · Source ↗
  8. 2018USCIS third-party worksite memo: denials spike · Source ↗
  9. 2020June 2020 H-1B entry ban + Oct 2020 DOL prevailing-wage IFR · Source ↗
  10. 2021Biden revokes entry ban; denials normalize · Source ↗
  11. 2025Trump introduces $100,000 payment for certain new H-1B petitions (Sept. 21) · Source ↗
  12. 2026Trump extends the $100,000 H-1B payment requirement through Sept. 21, 2027 · Source ↗
filings / workersWorkers requested

All filing statuses; quality-flagged rows excluded. Latest year can be incomplete. Headline totals use a different population.

National policy and source contextNot employer-specific events

Outcome breakdown (all years)

  • Certified94,136 · 99.2%
  • Denied87 · 0.1%
  • Withdrawn711 · 0.7%
Occupation mix

Top occupations (SOC) by filings

  • Software Developers20,583 · 30.1%
  • SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS, APPLICATIONS18,997 · 27.8%
  • Computer and Information Systems Managers7,537 · 11.0%
  • Operations Research Analysts6,115 · 8.9%
  • Business Intelligence Analysts5,357 · 7.8%
  • COMPUTER OCCUPATIONS, ALL OTHER3,772 · 5.5%
  • Other SOCs6,062 · 8.9%

Foreign-labor program mix

Shares count employer-linked disclosure rows across 3 programs, including all outcomes. LCA rows include H-1B, H-1B1, and E-3. These are filing records, not distinct workers. PERM is a labor certification; a prevailing-wage determination is a wage floor.

  • LCAs (H-1B, H-1B1, E-3)97,462 · 71.3%
  • PERM23,496 · 17.2%
  • Prevailing Wage15,708 · 11.5%

PERM labor cert (23,496)

Prevailing wage determinations (15,708)

Layoffs & WARN

Inspect notice dates and reported job cuts alongside the employer’s filing activity.

No matched layoff records are available in the loaded evidence. WARN coverage varies by state and employer.

Cumulative LCA requests and WARN layoffs

The worker comparison needs recorded LCA and WARN worker counts. Inspect source coverage for available records.

Each point adds all recorded worker counts through that calendar year. Blue: requested positions on H-1B LCAs by submission year, across all case outcomes. Red: reported workers affected in WARN notices by effective year. Both use one base-10 logarithmic count scale. Each major Y-axis step represents 10 times as many workers. Zero counts cannot appear on this scale; the table and CSV retain them. These are recorded position totals, not unique people or proof of replacement.

Totals start with each source’s first available count. Years without additional recorded counts carry the previous sum forward. Missing records and worker counts can leave totals incomplete. Quality-flagged records, undated records and WARN effective dates before 1988 are outside this timeline; source records stay in the archive. Open circles mark the current year and future periods as partial.

DOL LCA recordsState WARN records

Exact cumulative counts and method
Calendar yearLCA requested workers totalWARN affected workers totalCumulative WARN notices without a worker count
20172----
201817,607----
201926,965----
202052,968----
2021159,525----
2022227,271----
2023311,247----
2024372,791----
2025425,794----
2026 (partial)446,644----

Public money

Follow federal awards and state contracts to their agencies, dates and original records.

Federal contracts (11)

Federal awards EmployerRecordInspect each award, agency, date, and source record. Contract totals do not establish labor violations.

U.S. Agency for Global Media

OFFICE SUPPLIES AND STATIONERY RETAILERS

$18K

U.S. International Development Finance Corporation

STATIONERY AND OFFICE SUPPLIES MERCHANT WHOLESALERS

$150K

Library of Congress

BOOK, PERIODICAL, AND NEWSPAPER MERCHANT WHOLESALERS

$500

Environmental Protection Agency

COMPUTER AND COMPUTER PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE MERCHANT WHOLESALERS

$22K

U.S. Agency for Global Media

RADIO AND TELEVISION BROADCASTING AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING

$22K

Environmental Protection Agency

REMEDIATION SERVICES

$9K

Department of Education

OTHER COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING

$25K

General Services Administration

WHOLESALE TRADE AGENTS AND BROKERS

$0

State contracts ($12M · 44 contracts)

These state procurement records name this employer. They do not show H-1B use or how award funds were spent. Federal awards appear separately above.

Contract totals by state6 states · aggregate values & agencies
  • MA$6.9M
  • DE$3M
  • MD$2M
  • VA$90.9K
  • NJ$3.4K
  • VT$427

People & litigation

Connect court dockets, attorneys, signatories and related organizations.

Board & officers

Directors, officers and named executives listed in stored SEC proxies. The latest stored slate does not confirm who serves today.

Proxy year
Sort slate

Undated proxy records · 0 people

No SEC proxy slate records are stored for this employer.

Changes between proxies

A second dated slate is needed to identify changes. The first stored slate is a baseline, not evidence of joining.

    How the slate comparison works

    Each year uses its latest dated stored proxy file. We compare the same person record across successive stored years. An added person is labeled joined. An absent person is labeled not re-listed. A changed set of roles or titles is labeled new role. A name match alone does not combine people. State registrations and insider transaction forms are excluded. Stored lists can be incomplete.

    Corporate structure & ownershipOpen network map

    Explore relationship records and map
    Loading relationship records…

    Directors, officers & beneficial owners (3)

    Person · TitleOwnership · Role
    Jason Weinstein Authorized Representative
    Officer
    Michael Miller Treasurer
    Officer
    Michael Miller Manager
    manager

    Parent & subsidiary structure (1)

    Amazon.Com,Inc
    Parent

    Key people (146)

    vs BLS
    Rebecca/Andreas/Jeremiah/Shaina Michaels/Gerling/Stankus/SinghEmployer Contact
    22,170-1%168,471.387
    Andreas/Robert/Enis/Randi Gerling/Herreria/Garcia/BrazinskiEmployer Contact
    13,964+15%59,650.968
    Daniel/Charles/Andreas/Chongli Van Den Handel/Wilburn/Gerling/WuEmployer Contact
    1,419-10%48,292.226
    Andreas/Jeremiah Gerling/StankusEmployer Contact
    5,617+11%36,389.357
    Sarah / Donna / Bryan Ayres / Rudnicki / YoungEmployer Contact
    4,929+13%33,019.877
    Daniel/Charles/Andreas Van Den Handel/Wilburn/GerlingEmployer Contact
    270+6%20,061.971
    Daniel/Sarah/Andreas/Chongli Van Den Handel/Jensen/Gerling/WuEmployer Contact
    1,534+5%19,163.51
    Sarah / Olga / Bryan Ayres / Kolodina / YoungEmployer Contact
    1,934+19%9,083.781

    Litigation (34)

    Court EmployerRecordCase allegations and outcomes are distinct. Open each docket to inspect the claims and original records.
    Inspect case types8 categories · counts by nature of suit
    • Unknown12 · 35.3%
    • Employment9 · 26.5%
    • Personal Injury Product Liability7 · 20.6%
    • Patent2 · 5.9%
    • Code 8961 · 2.9%
    • Family and Medical Leave Act1 · 2.9%
    • Personal Injury Medical Malpractice1 · 2.9%
    • Civil Rights ADA (Employment)1 · 2.9%
    Case · Court · Suit

    Cesario v. Amazon.com Services LLC

    1:26-cv-09338 · District Court, N.D. Illinois

    Personal Injury Product Liability · 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

    Stocker v. Amazon.com Services LLC

    3:26-cv-00069 · District Court, S.D. Iowa

    Newsom v. Amazon.com Services LLC

    1:26-cv-08878 · District Court, N.D. Illinois

    Ellison v. Amazon.com Services LLC

    3:26-cv-07782 · District Court, N.D. California

    Valencia v. Amazon.com Services LLC

    2:26-cv-05113 · District Court, D. Arizona

    Employment · 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

    Vidales v. Amazon.com Services LLC

    1:26-cv-05522 · District Court, E.D. California

    Morales v. Amazon.com Services LLC

    1:26-cv-05484 · District Court, E.D. California

    Macario v. Amazon.com Services, LLC

    2:26-cv-04174 · District Court, E.D. New York

    Employment · 42:12101

    Attorneys & law firms (165)

    Attorney · Displaced

    Mary Kenney

    FRAGOMEN, del REY, Rnsen & LOEWY, LLP

    Wages vs BLS: +27%

    7,61717,960.244

    Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen, Loewy Llp

    FRAGOMEN, del REY, BERNSEN, Loewy LLP

    Wages vs BLS: +9%

    5,786181,855.147

    Daniel Maranci

    Wages vs BLS: +17%

    2,72626,627.274

    Molly Carey

    FRAGOMEN, del REY, BERNSEN, & Loewy LLP

    Wages vs BLS: -12%

    2,19524,410.201

    Berry, Appleman & Leiden, Llp

    BERRY, Appleman & LEIDEN, LLP

    Wages vs BLS: +2%

    1,41949,949.19

    Groban, Jr., Robert

    Wages vs BLS: -2%

    1,0495,056.001

    Aida Montes Peifer

    Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP

    Wages vs BLS: +27%

    7101,025.683

    Insider activity

    Compare SEC transactions, executive pay and company events. Timing alone does not establish misconduct.

    No linked insider or compensation records are available. SEC disclosure coverage depends on the company and filing type.

    Worksites & local wage patterns

    Where are workers requested? Compare the address records with county filing concentrations and wage benchmarks.

    Worksite locations (3,217)

    Rows group the recorded city, state, ZIP and county. Source spelling variants remain separate.

    vs BLS

    Each filing compares with the BLS national median for its occupation from the filing year. The gap uses matched filings only. Negative is below BLS; positive is above. Open a location to inspect its records.

    Seattle, WA

    98109King CountyBLS 2025: 11,919 of 11,919 filings matched
    +23%11,919

    Seattle, WA

    98121King CountyBLS 2025: 7,763 of 7,763 filings matched
    +22%7,763

    Bellevue, WA

    98004King CountyBLS 2025: 7,128 of 7,128 filings matched
    +25%7,128

    Seattle, WA

    Recorded as SEATTLE, WA

    98109King CountyBLS 2025: 6,710 of 6,710 filings matched
    +29%6,710

    Seattle, WA

    Recorded as SEATTLE, WA

    98121King CountyBLS 2025: 6,223 of 6,223 filings matched
    +27%6,223

    Sunnyvale, CA

    94089Santa Clara CountyBLS 2025: 4,408 of 4,408 filings matched
    +45%4,408

    Austin, TX

    78758Travis CountyBLS 2025: 3,568 of 3,568 filings matched
    +14%3,568

    New york, NY

    Recorded as New York, NY

    10001New York CountyBLS 2025: 2,336 of 2,336 filings matched
    +28%2,336

    Worksite distribution

    Location DOL BLS402 mapped counties

    County color shows filing volume. Hover for county-level wage comparisons; click to inspect its records.

    Mapped filing records97,308Year-unit wages · quality-flagged rows excluded
    County averages below BLS72 / 402Counties with a wage benchmark
    Loading map…
    Fewer filings10,000+ filings

    Volume uses a logarithmic scale. Counties without a BLS benchmark have no wage comparison.

    Evidence & sources

    Source catalog ↗
    Questions about the data & methods

    Has Amazon.com Services LLC filed H-1B labor condition applications (LCAs)?

    Yes. Amazon.com Services LLC filed 94,136 H-1B labor condition applications between 2017 and 2026, requesting 443,010 workers, per Department of Labor disclosure records. This dataset counts DOL LCAs, not USCIS Form I-129 petitions, so it does not show whether any petition was approved.

    How many H-1B filings does Amazon.com Services LLC have?

    94,136 certified H-1B filings covering 443,010 requested workers.

    What does Amazon.com Services LLC pay H-1B workers?

    The average offered wage across Amazon.com Services LLC's H-1B filings is $143,242 per year.

    Is Amazon.com Services LLC H-1B dependent?

    Yes. The Department of Labor classifies Amazon.com Services LLC as an H-1B dependent employer.

    Has Amazon.com Services LLC violated H-1B rules?

    Yes. The Department of Labor lists Amazon.com Services LLC as a willful violator of H-1B program rules.

    What worker-equivalent exposure does the displacement model estimate for Amazon.com Services LLC?

    A modeled estimate puts the figure at 495,280 worker equivalents (one per requested worker on a certified H-1B filing, plus a wage-gap multiplier, plus government-reported WARN layoffs matched to filings). This is a modeled exposure, not a count of documented displaced people, and it does not establish that any named worker lost a job.

    Has Amazon.com Services LLC faced H-1B wage enforcement?

    Yes. DOL's Wage and Hour Division recorded 1 H-1B case against Amazon.com Services LLC.

    Does Amazon.com Services LLC hold state government contracts?

    Yes. State procurement records show about $11,975,471 in contract value awarded to this employer across state agencies.

    Public source records and site analysis. We do not attest to accuracy. Read the full disclaimer.

    Dataset guides and site methods

    1. [1] Dataset documentation · DOL OFLC. LCA public disclosure record layout (FY2026 Q3). Pages 1–4: application, DOL outcome and dates, requested positions, employer, representatives, worksites and pay unitsThis layout covers determinations issued October 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026. It documents employer-provided application fields and DOL decisions, not USCIS decisions, payroll verification, legal bills or worker-linked moves. Older layouts can differ.Checked 2026-10-17.
    2. [2] Dataset documentation · DOL OFLC. PERM public disclosure record layout (FY2026 Q3). Pages 1–7: ETA-9089 application, DOL outcome and dates, employer, wages and recruitment fieldsThis layout covers determinations issued October 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026, on the form introduced June 1, 2023. A DOL certification is not I-140 approval or permanent residence. Older layouts can differ.Checked 2026-10-17.
    3. [3] Dataset documentation · DOL OFLC. Prevailing Wage disclosure record layout, FY2026 Q3. Page 1: CASE_NUMBER, CASE_STATUS, VISA_CLASS; pages 5–6: PWD_WAGE_RATE, PWD_UNIT_OF_PAY, wage source and validityApplication-level prevailing-wage requests and determinations. Wage units and case status must be read; a determination is not evidence of pay received.Checked 2026-10-18.
    4. [4] Dataset documentation · DOL OFLC. H-2A disclosure record layout, FY2026 Q3. Page 1: application case number and decision; page 5: separate job-order number, requested and certified H-2A workersEmployer application and labor-certification records, not a worker roster or arrival record. A case number differs from a job-order number.Checked 2026-10-18.
    5. [5] Dataset documentation · DOL OFLC. H-2B disclosure record layout, FY2026 Q3. Pages 1–2: case number, requested and certified workers, cap estimates and temporary-need categoriesCap-subject and cap-exempt counts are estimated requested workers. Temporary need includes seasonal, peakload, one-time and intermittent work.Checked 2026-10-18.
    6. [6] Dataset documentation · DOL OFLC. CW-1 disclosure record layout, FY2026 Q3. Page 1: application case number, status and cap-exempt flag; job information: requested and certified workersEmployer applications and labor-certification determinations. A certification is separate from a visa-petition decision or an admission.Checked 2026-10-18.
    7. [7] Dataset documentation · BLS. OEWS technical notes (May 2025). Scope of the survey; occupational coding; concepts and estimation methodologyDocuments occupation and geographic wage estimates, not an individual worker’s pay. Use the estimate year and geography stated by the site; older releases can differ.Checked 2026-10-17.
    8. [8] XH1B method or registry · XH1B. WARN Notices (mass layoffs): source registry; State Corporate Registries (Registered Agents): source registry; State contracts and Connecticut payments: source registry; Calculation and Matching Methods; Reading Public Records and Derived Indicators. Source registry entry: warn; Source registry entry: state-sos; Source registry entry: state_contracts; Filing units, annualization, weighting, wage comparisons, and inference limits; Reading records: units, source coverage, wage gaps, entity links, and inference limitsXH1B dataset description: One row per source_notice_id. The definition of a mass layoff and the layoff threshold vary by state. The threshold is typically 50 or more employees.; XH1B dataset description: Registered-agent and registered-office fields identify who receives legal notices. Texas, for example, permits registered-agent service companies to represent businesses. Shared agent or address details are review leads. They do not, by themselves, establish shared ownership, a shell company, or a violation. State rules vary.; XH1B dataset description: State government award and vendor records. Connecticut Open Expenditures records payments, including grants. Payment totals stay separate from contract awards. Record identity fields vary by source; amounts and descriptions do not set identity.; These are the site's review methods, not validated predictions of wrongdoing. Inspect underlying records and alternative explanations.
    9. [9] Dataset documentation · SEC. EDGAR Application Programming Interfaces. Submissions API: filing history, current/former names and ticker metadataDescribes filing metadata, not the contents or completeness of an ownership network.Checked 2026-10-18.
    10. [10] Guidance · SEC. Form 4: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership. March 2026 revision; page 1 relationship boxes; pages 2–3 holdings/transactions; instructions 1(c) and 4A reporting-person role differs from a numeric holding. One issuer filing can contain multiple transaction rows.Checked 2026-10-18.
    11. [11] Law or rulemaking · U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Schedule 14A: directors, officers and security ownership. Schedule 14A, Items 6(d) and 7: security-ownership and director/executive-officer disclosuresDefines proxy disclosure requirements. A filing describes a stated period or date. An omitted name does not establish a departure. A site identity match does not establish ownership or current service.Checked 2026-10-18.
    12. [12] Guidance · U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Executive Compensation. Summary Compensation Table and proxy-statement overview; guide modified September 2, 2011Explains where reported executive compensation appears. It does not verify a named executive’s extracted amount, net worth, market capitalization or immigration history.Checked 2026-10-18.
    13. [13] Guidance · U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Form 8-K: Item 5.02. Item 5.02(b)–(d), PDF pages 27–28: officer/director departures, appointments and electionsExplains the reportable event and date fields. A stored event or filing accession is not an independently verified personnel history; inspect the named filing when a retained source URL is available.Checked 2026-10-18.
    14. [14] Dataset documentation · USAspending / U.S. Treasury. Federal Spending Guide: contract transactions. Pages 3, 5, 9 and 17: transactions, amount fields and recipient identifiersContract downloads contain prime award transactions. XH1B’s use of recipient identifiers for employer links is its own processing step.Checked 2026-10-18.
    15. [15] Dataset documentation · Free Law Project. PACER Data APIs: dockets, parties and attorneys. Overview; Dockets; Parties; AttorneysExplains linked docket, entry, document, party and attorney objects. Missing matches or documents are not evidence that no case or filing exists.Checked 2026-10-18.
    16. [16] Dataset documentation · DOL Wage and Hour Division. Wage and Hour Division Compliance Action Data. Dataset description: concluded actions since FY2005, back wages, employees and civil money penaltiesThe published dataset covers concluded compliance actions, including whether violations were found. It is not a list of pending complaints or proof that every reported amount was collected.Checked 2026-10-18.
    17. [17] Primary record · DOL Wage and Hour Division. H-1B Willful Violator List. List effective October 1, 2026; named employers and willful-violation determination datesThis list gives determination dates, not disqualification periods. A historical listing does not prove a current bar or wrongdoing by a similarly named entity.Checked 2026-10-17.
    18. [18] Guidance · CMS. Hospital 2552-10 data documentation. HOSP2010_README.txt sections 2–3 and 6; HCRIS_DataDictionary.csv: RPT_REC_NUM, FY_BGN_DT, FY_END_DT, RPT_STUS_CDThe documentation allows multiple cost reports for one hospital in a year. Status distinguishes as submitted, settled without audit, settled with audit, reopened and amended reports.Checked 2026-10-18.
    19. [19] Guidance · CMS. Provider Reimbursement Manual, Chapter 40, Transmittal 18. December 2022; section 4005.2, Worksheet S-3 Part II, printed pages 40-58.2–40-59; PDF pages 86–87Salary costs come from the general ledger; paid hours come from payroll reports. These aggregate worksheet values are not individual H-1B payroll records. This is a named historical instruction edition.Checked 2026-10-18.
    20. [20] Dataset documentation · HHS OIG. LEIE Database & Supplement Downloads. LEIE Database Download; monthly file strategy; filename datesThe full file lists exclusions in effect. OIG removes reinstated entries and replaces the file monthly; the filename refers to actions through the previous month.Checked 2026-10-18.
    21. [21] Guidance · HHS OIG. Background Information & Exclusion Authorities. Types of exclusions; effects; statutory authority tableMandatory and permissive authorities differ. The type code must be read against its statutory ground; an exclusion is not automatically a criminal conviction.Checked 2026-10-18.
    22. [22] Guidance · HHS OIG. LEIE Database Record Layout. One-page field list: names, EXCLTYPE, EXCLDATE, REINDATE, WAIVERDATE, WAIVERSTATEThe layout records exclusion, reinstatement and waiver fields. It does not define every field’s legal meaning or verify an identity match.Checked 2026-10-18.
    23. [23] XH1B method or registry · XH1B. Displacement Model and Assumptions. Eligibility, requested-position weighting, scopes, WARN matching, and counting limitsModel outputs are estimates. A matched layoff notice does not prove that an H-1B worker replaced a laid-off worker.
    24. [24] XH1B method or registry · XH1B. Downstream Research and Methods. Study populations, parameter bounds, baselines, and expected outcomes; linked model card
    25. [25] Guidance · Texas Secretary of State. Registered Agents FAQs. What is a registered agent?; Who can be a registered agent?; registered-agent service companiesA registered agent receives legal notices. A service company can represent unrelated entities. Shared agent details do not, by themselves, establish shared ownership or misconduct. Other states have their own rules.Checked 2026-10-08.