Read the record summary
Farrell LLP appears in 4,856 H-1B labor condition applications for 23 employers. The average annual offered wage is $194,257/year. These are filing wage offers, not payroll observations. Those filings have an estimated $42M offered-wage gap to BLS medians. Their client filings yield 8.34K worker-equivalent exposures under the displacement model, not verified layoffs.
Source import recorded Sep 2, 2026
What the records contain / DOL labor condition applications
What XH1B calculates / Comparisons & modeled estimates
How to read these figures
Certified H-1B headline counts differ from the all-outcome client and recent-record lists. Median wages use records with a reported yearly wage. Mean wages and BLS comparisons use the certified filing summary. Modeled exposure is not an observed count of job losses.
Definitions & methodologyRead the firm record
Certified H-1B filing history
DOL records name Farrell LLP in 4,856 certified H-1B LCAs with reported wages across 23 employers.
Clients and concentration
The client table contains 26 linked employer records across all LCA outcomes and visa classes.
The largest linked employer is ByteDance Inc., with 1,934 firm-linked filings.
The five largest clients account for 93.5% of 5,111 employer-linked filings.
Latest recorded filing year
Submission year 2026 records 613 filings and 793 worker requests. The latest year can be incomplete.
Recorded submissions change from 1,269 in 2024 to 1,565 in 2025 (+23.3%). Coverage can differ between years.
Client industry mix
Information / Media (NAICS 51) has the most filings: 3,818, or 74.7% of 5,111 records with a usable industry code.
The leading occupation is Software Developers, Systems Software (SOC 15-1252), with 1,725 firm-linked filings.
Offered wages and BLS comparisons
The median offered wage is $180,000/year across 5,104 filings with positive wages reported per year. This sample includes all LCA outcomes and visa classes.
The stored model population includes 4,856 certified H-1B filings. The offered wage is below the BLS occupation median in 637 filings. This population also includes filings without reported wages.
The all-outcome employer-linked matched sample compares 5,110 unflagged filings with national BLS occupation medians as of each filing year. Records without a filing date use the latest loaded national survey. Latest benchmark year in this scope: 2025. Offered wages are below the benchmark in 471 filings. Eligible positive-wage records without a usable benchmark: 0 filings.
Amazon.com Services LLC contributes the largest client count below BLS: 164 filings. These are source comparisons, not findings about wages paid.
Matched names and source coverage
This page describes 1 source spelling found in source records. No approved firm identity is attached to this name.
The recent preview contains 100 recent source records. It is not the full archive.
About these record populations
This headline excludes records flagged for data quality. LCA certification does not establish a USCIS approval, a hire, or a current vacancy.
Annual totals include H-1B filings across outcomes and exclude records flagged for data quality. Coverage can differ by year. The latest year can be incomplete.
Industry totals include all LCA outcomes and visa classes. They describe employer filings, not the location or services of the law firm.
Yearly wage percentiles and annualized client averages can use different records. A BLS comparison is a benchmark, not a legal finding or a measure of wages paid.
Source listings show a filing relationship. They do not establish who signed a filing, current firm membership, or misconduct.
Filing activity
Annual totals include H-1B records with all outcomes. They exclude records with data quality flags. The latest year can be incomplete. Requested workers are not confirmed hires.
Offered-wage distribution
- Median offered wage
- $180,000
- 10th percentile
- $116,100
- 90th percentile
- $294,280
5,104 records with a reported yearly wage. Includes all LCA outcomes and visa classes.
Model & sources
Calculated exposure from firm-linked filings; not observed job losses
Modeled displacement exposure
8,343
The math
637 of 4856 filings below BLS median
. The 1.0 base rate per certified H-1B worker request is a site model assumption. Wage gap multiplier = (BLS median − offered wage) / BLS median, applied only to filings offering less than the BLS median. Related research provides context, not validation of these exact coefficients. This is a modeled estimate, not a count of actual displacements.
Exposure method v1.2 · This is a modeled worker-equivalent count.
Source coverage
Browse data sources →DOL filing records
The certified headline counts H-1B filings with reported wages and excludes flagged records. The model population also includes filings without reported wages. Client, listed-name, industry, and recent-record lists include all LCA outcomes and visa classes.
Offered wages & BLS
Percentiles use positive wages reported per year. Matched means use eligible annualized wages across outcomes. Reported client means can include other wage units and large converted values. Inspect the filing status and original unit.
Matched names & listed people
Matched firm spellings combine related source records. A name in a filing does not prove current firm membership. Unresolved person names remain separate from resolved people.
Latest decision in this firm record: 2026-03-30. The header update date describes the wider dataset.
Inspect 1 matched source spellings
These are the approved member spellings or the single unresolved source name. Counts describe different certified populations. Years use the H-1B submission series. A missing value is not zero.
| Source spelling | Certified with wages | Model population | Submission years | Calculated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farrell LLP | 4,856 | 4,856 | 2021–2026 | 2026-11-04 |
Matched wage records: 5,110. Missing usable benchmarks: 0. BLS year: 2025. Calculated: 2026-10-27T08:15:21.894Z.
DOL filings can name an attorney or agent. This page groups those listed names. A listed name does not prove who signed a filing or whether anyone broke a rule. For attorneys →
Firm and client court records
A filing or a named party does not establish wrongdoing. Direct firm records require an explicit active identity match to the named court party. A lawyer listed as counsel does not make the firm a party. Client cases stay separate.
Cases naming the matched firm as a party
0 matching records
No matching records in this archive.
Cases naming matched clients as parties
These cases name employer records in active same-entity client groups. They are client evidence, not cases against the firm. Court coverage is limited to the archived federal dockets.
80 matching records
Cesario v. Amazon.com Services LLC
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026-08-05
Matched parties, as filed
- Amazon.com Services LLC · Party type: defendant
Haugland v. Amazon Web Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Hawaii · 2026-08-04
Matched parties, as filed
- Amazon Web Services, Inc. · Party type: defendant
Stocker v. Amazon.com Services LLC
District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2026-07-30
Matched parties, as filed
- Amazon.com Services LLC · Party type: defendant
Ellison v. Amazon.com Services LLC
District Court, N.D. California · 2026-07-27
Matched parties, as filed
- Amazon.com Services LLC · Party type: defendant
Newsom v. Amazon.com Services LLC
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026-07-27
Matched parties, as filed
- Amazon.com Services LLC · Party type: defendant
Valencia v. Amazon.com Services LLC
District Court, D. Arizona · 2026-07-21
Matched parties, as filed
- Amazon.com Services LLC · Party type: defendant
Vidales v. Amazon.com Services LLC
District Court, E.D. California · 2026-07-16
Matched parties, as filed
- Amazon.com Services LLC · Party type: defendant
Morales v. Amazon.com Services LLC
District Court, E.D. California · 2026-07-15
Matched parties, as filed
- Amazon.com Services LLC · Party type: defendant
Wages & industries
Client wages use matched records. Industry totals include all outcomes. The model uses its separate certified H-1B population.
Client industries
- Information / Media (NAICS 51)3,818 · 74.7%
- Retail Trade (NAICS 45)670 · 13.1%
- Professional / Scientific / Tech (NAICS 54)609 · 11.9%
- Mining / Oil & Gas (NAICS 21)7 · 0.1%
- Manufacturing (NAICS 33)5 · 0.1%
- Other sectors2 · 0.0%
All recorded sectors with a usable industry code. Filings include all LCA outcomes and visa classes.
| Industry sector | Filings | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Information / MediaNAICS 51 | 3,818 | 74.7% |
| Retail TradeNAICS 45 | 670 | 13.1% |
| Professional / Scientific / TechNAICS 54 | 609 | 11.9% |
| Mining / Oil & GasNAICS 21 | 7 | 0.1% |
| ManufacturingNAICS 33 | 5 | 0.1% |
| ManufacturingNAICS 31 | 2 | 0.0% |
5,111 filings with a usable industry code. All recorded sectors are included.
Offered wages against BLS
- Matched offered mean
- $193,734
- Mean matched BLS median
- $120,700
- Offered vs BLS median
- +61%
- Filings below BLS
- 13%
The headline counts certified H-1B filings with reported wages. Matched client wage means use the same eligible source records. The model uses a separate certified population and does not measure observed job losses.
Percentiles use positive wages reported per year. Matched means use eligible annualized wages across outcomes. Reported client means can include other wage units and large converted values. Inspect the filing status and original unit.
Client wage comparisons
All outcomes and visa classes; flagged records are excluded from wage comparisons. Both means use the same filings with a positive annualized offer and positive national BLS median. Each record uses its reported SOC and the latest survey at or before its filing year. Records without a filing date use the latest loaded national survey. Missing benchmarks do not count as zero gaps.
Default order: number of individual filings below BLS. Annual shortfall sums positive benchmark minus offered wage once per filing, without multiplying by worker requests. It is not a measure of wages paid.
| Compared filings | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amazon.com Services LLCWage sample and filing dates
| 667 | 6660 missing benchmarks | 164 | $2,485,662 | $142,401Mean BLS median $116,912 · latest year 2024+22% |
ByteDance Inc.Wage sample and filing dates
| 1,934 | 1,9340 missing benchmarks | 101 | $1,579,422 | $208,478Mean BLS median $122,445 · latest year 2025+70% |
TikTok Inc.Wage sample and filing dates
| 1,305 | 1,3050 missing benchmarks | 75 | $1,095,664 | $206,176Mean BLS median $122,118 · latest year 2025+69% |
Amazon WEB SERVICES, Inc.Wage sample and filing dates
| 197 | 1970 missing benchmarks | 59 | $890,222 | $122,321Mean BLS median $108,410 · latest year 2024+13% |
TT Commerce & Global Services LLCWage sample and filing dates
| 582 | 5820 missing benchmarks | 28 | $414,109 | $212,243Mean BLS median $121,637 · latest year 2025+74% |
TikTok U.S. Data Security Inc.Wage sample and filing dates
| 290 | 2900 missing benchmarks | 20 | $249,307 | $188,427Mean BLS median $119,387 · latest year 2025+58% |
Amazon Development Center U.S., Inc.Wage sample and filing dates
| 39 | 390 missing benchmarks | 8 | $78,442 | $148,661Mean BLS median $127,647 · latest year 2024+16% |
Quorum Business Solutions (U.S.A.) Inc.Wage sample and filing dates
| 9 | 90 missing benchmarksSmall sample | 3 | $145,240 | $147,794Mean BLS median $146,109 · latest year 2025+1% |
Full filing history
Client filing worksite states, not firm offices. Filing counts include all outcomes and visa classes. Worker totals and wage comparisons exclude flagged records. Unknown source states remain visible.
Occupations in firm-linked filings
Full-history canonical SOC groups. Counts include every outcome. Worker totals and wage comparisons exclude flagged records. Offered and BLS means use the same positive matched records. Raw SOC values remain on source records.
| Occupation | Firm-linked filings | Worker requests | Compared filings | Matched offered mean | Mean BLS median / latest year | Below BLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Software Developers, Systems Software (15-1252)Occupation profileOutcomes and wage sample
| 1,725 | 3,114 | 1,724 | $190,740 | $131,6932025 | 165 |
Data Scientists (15-2051)Occupation profileOutcomes and wage sample
| 901 | 1,545 | 901 | $203,492 | $115,2862025 | 65 |
Software Quality Assurance Engineers and Testers (15-1299)Occupation profileOutcomes and wage sample
| 324 | 527 | 324 | $207,976 | $107,1522025 | 23 |
Marketing Managers (11-2021)Occupation profileOutcomes and wage sample
| 271 | 342 | 271 | $230,751 | $164,2092025 | 51 |
Search Marketing Strategists (13-1161)Occupation profileOutcomes and wage sample
| 224 | 283 | 224 | $157,520 | $78,0242025 | 5 |
Operations Research Analysts (15-2031)Occupation profileOutcomes and wage sample
| 208 | 300 | 208 | $165,176 | $88,2162025 | 15 |
Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers (15-1253)Occupation profileOutcomes and wage sample
| 203 | 347 | 203 | $178,726 | $103,1792025 | 7 |
Computer and Information Systems Managers (11-3021)Occupation profileOutcomes and wage sample
| 182 | 352 | 182 | $304,106 | $172,8582025 | 17 |
Annual filing outcomes
Calendar year of the decision date. Counts include all outcomes and visa classes. Worker totals sum reported requests and exclude flagged records. Medians use positive annualized offered wages and exclude flagged records. Missing years are not confirmed zeroes.
| Decision year | Firm-linked filings | Worker requests | Certified | Certified–withdrawn | Denied | Withdrawn | Other / unknown | Median offered wage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026Year can be incompleteOutcomes and wage sample
| 621 | 801 | 597 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0 | $205,000 |
2025Outcomes and wage sample
| 1,579 | 2,947 | 1,429 | 107 | 0 | 43 | 0 | $200,000 |
2024Outcomes and wage sample
| 1,321 | 2,243 | 1,314 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | $186,456 |
2023Outcomes and wage sample
| 973 | 1,585 | 951 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 0 | $160,000 |
2022Outcomes and wage sample
| 569 | 591 | 547 | 9 | 1 | 12 | 0 | $145,000 |
2021Outcomes and wage sample
| 48 | 208 | 46 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | $124,707 |
Client filing worksites
Client filing worksite states, not firm offices. Filing counts include all outcomes and visa classes. Worker totals and wage comparisons exclude flagged records. Unknown source states remain visible.
| Worksite state | Firm-linked filings | Worker requests | Compared filings | Matched offered mean | Mean BLS median / latest year | Below BLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
California (CA)Outcomes and wage sample
| 2,964 | 4,292 | 2,964 | $210,706 | $122,2012025 | 123 |
Washington (WA)Outcomes and wage sample
| 1,407 | 2,572 | 1,406 | $185,778 | $121,6382025 | 169 |
New York (NY)Outcomes and wage sample
| 288 | 406 | 288 | $163,809 | $114,1712025 | 29 |
Texas (TX)Outcomes and wage sample
| 234 | 609 | 234 | $126,474 | $116,1802025 | 88 |
Virginia (VA)Outcomes and wage sample
| 58 | 192 | 58 | $128,234 | $110,3212025 | 14 |
Massachusetts (MA)Outcomes and wage sample
| 28 | 82 | 28 | $123,501 | $111,1632024 | 10 |
Oregon (OR)Outcomes and wage sample
| 17 | 26 | 17 | $116,771 | $100,4192024 | 3 |
Tennessee (TN)Outcomes and wage sample
| 17 | 44 | 17 | $111,899 | $107,8112024 | 6 |
Compare the same work and year
Each row groups the same canonical occupation and decision calendar year. Both wage means use the same positive, unflagged offers. Each filing uses its reported SOC and the latest positive national BLS median at or before its filing year. Records without a filing date use the latest loaded national survey. All outcomes and visa classes are included.
Decision year 2025 · SOC 15-1252 · Sorted by compared filing count. This is a sample comparison, not a ranking of firm quality.
| Firm | Compared filings | Below-BLS share | Matched offered mean | Offered vs BLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Farrell LLPThis firmDetails
| 474 | 3.4%16 / 474 | $207,475 | 52.6% |
FRAGOMEN, del REY & Bernsen & LOEWY, LLPDetails
| 27,979 | 28.6%8,011 / 27,979 | $162,989 | 20.0% |
Berry Appleman & Leiden LLPDetails
| 18,327 | 26.6%4,879 / 18,327 | $163,303 | 20.1% |
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, Smoak & STEWART, P.C.Details
| 8,952 | 31.9%2,854 / 8,952 | $153,619 | 13.0% |
Corporate Immigration Partners, P.C.Details
| 4,348 | 32.0%1,392 / 4,348 | $163,075 | 20.0% |
Erickson Immigration GroupDetails
| 3,293 | 11.9%391 / 3,293 | $185,543 | 36.5% |
EY Law LLPDetails
| 2,698 | 28.1%757 / 2,698 | $164,391 | 21.1% |
Law Office of Thomas V. ALLEN, PLLC.Details
| 2,550 | 92.7%2,363 / 2,550 | $110,207 | -18.9% |
Recent source records (100)
This is a recent-record window, not the full archive. It includes all LCA outcomes and visa classes. Counts and sorting apply to this window.
Explore full history · Recent preview
TT Commerce & Global Services LLC(1 position requested)
Seller Growth Operation Manager, Incubation Strategy · Bellevue 98004 · 2026-03-30
TT Commerce & Global Services LLC(1 position requested)
Category Manager - Fashion · Culver City 90230 · 2026-03-27
ByteDance Inc.(1 position requested)
Senior Frontend Software Engineer, Global E-commerce · San Jose 95110 · 2026-03-27
ByteDance Inc.(1 position requested)
Backend Software Engineer, Shop Ads · Bellevue 98004 · 2026-03-27
ByteDance Inc.(1 position requested)
Machine Learning Engineer - Demand Forecasting · San Jose 95110 · 2026-03-27
ByteDance Inc.(1 position requested)
Software Engineer - Serverless Compute Infrastructure · San Jose 95110 · 2026-03-27
TT Commerce & Global Services LLC(1 position requested)
Category Special Project (Global E-Commerce-Fashion) · Culver City 90230 · 2026-03-25
TT Commerce & Global Services LLC(1 position requested)
Quality Assurance Manager · San Jose 95110 · 2026-03-25
A negative % sits below the BLS market median; a positive % sits above.
Questions about the data & methods
Does Farrell LLP file H-1B filings?
Yes. Farrell LLP is named on 4,856 H-1B labor condition applications across 23 employers, per Department of Labor disclosure records.
How many employers use Farrell LLP for H-1B filings?
23 employers have filed H-1B filings naming Farrell LLP, totaling 4,856 filings.
What does Farrell LLP do in the H-1B process?
The disclosure names the firm associated with the attorney or agent on the H-1B labor condition application. This links the firm to the filing. It does not establish who signed the employer declaration or prove misconduct.
What wage data is on record for Farrell LLP's H-1B filings?
Certified H-1B filings with reported wages have a mean annualized offered wage of $194,257. Flagged records are excluded. In the separate model-certified population, 13% offer below BLS. That population includes filings without reported wages. Offered wages are source values, not a measure of wages paid.
How many names are listed as attorneys or agents for Farrell LLP?
The source-name table contains 13 groups linked to Farrell LLP. These groups can contain people, organization names, or unresolved names. A listing does not prove a signature or current firm membership.
What worker-equivalent exposure does the model assign to filings naming Farrell LLP?
The model assigns about 8,343 worker-equivalent exposures to certified filings that name Farrell LLP. This is not a count of documented job losses or a finding against the firm. Each employer's page shows its own breakdown.
How can I report misconduct involving Farrell LLP?
Current or former employees, clients, and contractors can file a confidential tip on the XH1B whistleblower page. Reports are timestamped and hash-sealed on arrival, and they support investigations into H-1B program abuse.
Public source records and site analysis. We do not attest to accuracy. Read the full disclaimer.
Dataset guides and site methods
- [1] Dataset documentation · DOL OFLC. LCA public disclosure record layout (FY2026 Q3). Pages 1–4: application, DOL outcome and dates, requested positions, employer, representatives, worksites and pay unitsThis layout covers determinations issued October 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026. It documents employer-provided application fields and DOL decisions, not USCIS decisions, payroll verification, legal bills or worker-linked moves. Older layouts can differ.Checked 2026-10-17.
- [2] Dataset documentation · BLS. OEWS technical notes (May 2025). Scope of the survey; occupational coding; concepts and estimation methodologyDocuments occupation and geographic wage estimates, not an individual worker’s pay. Use the estimate year and geography stated by the site; older releases can differ.Checked 2026-10-17.
- [3] Dataset documentation · Free Law Project. PACER Data APIs: dockets, parties and attorneys. Overview; Dockets; Parties; AttorneysExplains linked docket, entry, document, party and attorney objects. Missing matches or documents are not evidence that no case or filing exists.Checked 2026-10-18.
- [4] XH1B method or registry · XH1B. Calculation and Matching Methods; Reading Public Records and Derived Indicators. Filing units, annualization, weighting, wage comparisons, and inference limits; Reading records: units, source coverage, wage gaps, entity links, and inference limitsThese are the site's review methods, not validated predictions of wrongdoing. Inspect underlying records and alternative explanations.
- [5] XH1B method or registry · XH1B. Displacement Model and Assumptions. Eligibility, requested-position weighting, scopes, WARN matching, and counting limitsModel outputs are estimates. A matched layoff notice does not prove that an H-1B worker replaced a laid-off worker.
- [6] XH1B method or registry · XH1B. Downstream Research and Methods. Study populations, parameter bounds, baselines, and expected outcomes; linked model card